Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Seems strange to allow user input (Score -1) 89

Turning them off and landing in an empty field or on the Hudson, or rolling off the end of the runway may be preferable to the plane burning itself up in flight. It's extremely unlikely it was entirely unforced error and the pilot/copilot did something malicious.

Obviously it wouldn't be preferable ever at this airport, but there is an assumption that the pilots arent actively trying to down the aircraft.

There are thousands if not millions of ways a pilot can actively sabotage the aircraft. They are the one group on the plane that is trusted not to. It's nearly impossible to prevent it without removing them entirely from the plane. And all the passengers too ...

Sometimes, not very often ... the pilot is a problem.

Comment Re: Expectations (Score -1) 37

No.

No breaks or excuses.

You cant bolt security on after the fact. The entire protocol and application MUST take security into account from the start.

Trying to add security on after the fact is how we ended up with ActiveX on web pages and VBA in documents and NEVER WERE ABLE TO MAKE IT SECURE.

To make web browsers secure, they pretty much all started over (website, firefox) because trying to strap it on was impossible.

Comment Re: Fuel or electrical? (Score -1) 106

You dont typically use avgas in fuel trucks at large airports like this as most ICE engines are on small aircraft that dont fly in large airports for all sorts of reasons.

You dont fly your little Cessna single engine into an airport with 787s landing or taking off. Thats a nightmare/disaster in the works. The Cessna would be like a leaf in a hurricane.

They drive to a gas pump AWAY from the jet wash that will destroy them.

Larger prop driven aircraft are powered by turboprop engines - they use jet fuel as well, not areas.

It's not impossible of course, but pretty unlikely.

Comment Re: Really? (Score -1) 106

Nope, you can absolutely roll off the end of the runway at any speed except full stop. Take off is always a choice.

The landing in the other hand is governed by physics, mostly gravity. If you dont leave orbit, landing is mandatory, its only a question of when and what it looks like. The aircraft will be on the ground eventually.

It may be a good landing, it may be a fiery crash, but you absolutely are going to land.

Comment Re: Why is NPM such a target? (Score -1) 6

JS developers are typically less experienced, less qualified developers who tend not to know all the ways you can be exploited by software from a 3rd party.

A very simple example of this is that almost all who use NPM have their builds configured to use the very latest version of each dependency, which means they have no idea what code is actually used each build.

This practice is encouraged by the community, and it takes extra effort to pin versions. This is pretty basic engineering stupidity, but its the NPM way.

Then th ey usually build their app each time it starts. It's not recompile, it goes and pulls down the dependency, whatever the latest version is ... each time it runs.

So even if it was built and 'released' with version X of its dependency, it could restart with X.1, or same version number, but hacked version upstream ( this has literally happened multiple times over the years ) because there is no validation.

Then, the "language" is so broken and non-standard there are dependencies for some silly shit, like parsing tabs correctly, and so each dependency you pull in, it may have a dependency tree of another hundred things.

The end result is pulling in even though basic things, you pull in hundreds of other dependencies. All of them set to then pull the latest version of child dependencies without any sort of validation.

NPM is used by a bunch of immature developers who lack the experience to understand that pretty much everything they consider a feature of the language is in fact a flaw that other languages/ecosystems dont allow for or highly discourage.

JS/NODE/NPM are designed around and encourage anti-patterns the rest of us stopped doing years ago.

Comment Re: no. (Score -1) 187

Well, as typical with a JS fanboy, you need to get your facts straight. This is why the rest of us dont take you seriously.

Quantum computing is very very very rarely faster than classical computing today. It has NO practical value and its big "wins" have been simulated in most cases, about what they'll be able to do eventually after working out more bugs. It is currently 100% useless beyond research.

But this is exactly the kind of uneducated decisions that come from JS developers.

NPM is just one, but not the only example required to understand why your a dumbass to use JS for anything. That level of craptastic pervades the entire JS ecosystem. Im sure you think NPM is wonderful.

Comment Re: no. (Score -1) 187

Meh, I too call bullshit on your claims.

45 years? That puts you in a pretty small group of people. All of which have enough experience to know why those languages are ones you run away from.

OR your last 45 years of "programming" experience has been at the Excel macro/VBA level, in which case you arent qualified to be at the big boys table either.

I'd like to believe you, but my 25 years of building complex systems has seen how people trying to use kiddie languages for anything beyond a basic ops script ends badly and takes years to unwind.

If you've been using those languages for serious work over the last 45 years, I'm the guy who has to come in and replace your jumbled pile of crap script after you get fired.

The fact that you dont understand that those aren't appropriate for most things is a strong reflection on your lack of engineering prowess and actual experience. Use the right tool for the job, and dont build yourself into a hole.

You arent magically different than every other low grade Javascript dev, you just dont realize it.

Comment Re: The story warrants dismissive (Score -1) 88

Linus doesn't brow beat anyone.

He just doesn't put up with arrogant and ignorant snowflake developers who think they are gods gift to the world.

He doesn't care about your little feelings, He cares about code quality. And every single time you saw Linus go off on someone- it was after the person pushed back like they were king shit and acted like Linus wasn't the kernel maintainer for 30 years and that their 6 month journey into writing Linux device drivers for their unheard of project for the first time makes them Billy Bad Ass know it all.

Linus is a douche to douchebags, rarely if ever does he go off on someone that doesn't 100% deserve it.

Stop crying

Comment Re: meet the new boss (Score -1) 18

There will be a middle man for 99.999% of the apps out there. No indie/small dev runs their own stores. You just dont know who the middle will be anymore. Could be some 3rd party in Nigeria working with the Prince so Flappy Bird can sell you new flaps.

Yay! I can worry about who Im give my Cc# to again, and how they store it

Comment Re: Less shitty (Score -1) 18

Well considering Epic and Tim Sweeney are really shifty people, im not sure it will change anything.

Epic is a scamming company that rips off 13 year olds.

Tim Sweeney can't keep his word or follow through on what he said he'd do, except sue Apple. Fuck his local community, they don't maold.

The Epic store is so shifty that the only games anyone has on it, we're given away in a weekly special in an attempt to get users. But no one even gets the freebies anymore, it's just not worth it.

Tim Sweeney and Epic are EXACTLY the kind of organization Apple was trying to protect against and they were right.

OMG yea, Apple doesn't take 30%. WHO THE FUCK CARES. No one that matters cares that Apple takes it. The only people that do are the greedy grifters (Epic) and shifty business models on the verge of failure (Spotify). No anyone can take your money, personal information and detailef purchase history and sell it to the highest bidder.

Congratulations, you get to go back to the Internet shitfest that was pre-iPhone. That was wonderful. Every half wit without a clue running their own insecure, ready to hack "shopping cart".

If you're happy about this, you utterly fail to understand what you've lost and are the type of person to cut off your nose to spite your own face.

Comment Re:I'm a more serious post. (Score 0) 42

Its worse than just tracking cookies. If you use google to login to them, the try to sneak in a consent to monitor your email - the literally read the email looking for stuff related to other retails and put it in their app and website for tracking. Got an email from amazon? The shopify app will notify you with a device notification everytime AMZ sends an email update about the product.

After I dealt with them for a single transaction - never again, scummy fucking company

Comment You not understanding the problem is a YOU problem (Score 0) 76

I'm not sure what was supposed to be gained by such ignorant statements.

You are the CEO of a company thats been involved in net neutrality fights and law suites for decades - and you claim you don't understand anything about it?

You suck at your job, or you're posturing lying ahole.

To be fair, its verizon, he sucks at his job and is a lying ahole knowing full well that everything he says related to this topic is bullshit :/

Slashdot Top Deals

"Just the facts, Ma'am" -- Joe Friday

Working...