Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment A shittier version of Siri, Echo, Alexa (Score 1) 105

I've used all the old voice assistants, every time I asked a question they all seemed to default to a wikipedia search. A wikipedia search with a laggy, mistake-prone voice input.

So now there's a new "AI" version that won't even use proper wikipedia, it'll just make stuff up.

Unfortunately, it will probably be wildly successful.

Comment Re:Even if the features appealed... (Score 4, Interesting) 105

I don't get the AI companies' fascination with voice-only input and audio-only output. It's a strict subset of what the device in people's hands can already do. Further, every single product that has aimed for this has flopped and you would think they would get the hint by now...

Voice input will always be less accurate than writing. Voice output will always be slower than displaying writing on a screen. Input accuracy is even worse if you don't have a perfect mid-atlantic accent.

I can only come up with two explanations for why companies (not just "AI" companies) keep trying to force this on us.
1. They have so much money they don't care, or they are using investors' money and have a robust contract in place so it's OK if they waste the money.
2. The profit from selling all the data from inside your house is worth loads of money. I can see how knowing exactly what is being said in every household could be valuable to many different customers: advertisers, governments, health insurers.... note also that none of these customers have your best interests at heart. It gets even worse if you work from home and these devices can listen to confidential business calls.

I don't allow any such devices in my house. If I visit people who do have such devices, it's fun to mess with them. Obligatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1807/

Comment Re:From the article it's just browser fingerprinti (Score 1) 83

... and fittingly, gotta turn off Javascript to view the link. Best sort of paywall, though -- the variety you can opt out of with one click.

It worked OK for me. I'm using PiHole with the default settings, no adblocker. I find the BBC too infested with ads to use without something to reduce the ads.

Comment Re:From the article it's just browser fingerprinti (Score 3, Interesting) 83

Did anyone mention recently that simultaneously controlling both the most popular web browser and several of the most popular ad-supported web properties might be a little anticompetitive, and that it's about time that Google was broken up? It's probably time for that drum to start beating a bit louder again.

I remember when Microsoft got hit with an anti-trust suit because they bundled the browser with the OS. Here in 2026 Google owns the browser, the OS and the search engine. If you're on a chromebook or a Pixel they also control the hardware. Why is this allowed?

Comment Re:Kick 'em outside (Score 1) 59

Mandate teenagers go outside and interact with their peers. While I'm sure that this idea might at first horrify some of you, there's nothing that says they can't go play D&D together or any number of nerdy things that everyone here did before the internet existed. Social media should have an age restriction at least as great as alcohol and tobacco, if not higher.

Here in Australia where there has been a social media ban for a few months, I see more teenagers outdoors. Sometimes they are congregating in groups with their peers ("gangs"???) Sometimes they are riding e-bikes and doing graffiti and it really annoys the boomers. So it really is a win: the kids are getting some fresh air, interacting with humans, and some grumpy old bastards are grumpy. Ironically, those grumpy old bastards are often doing their whining on social media.

Comment Re:Goodbye, Faceschnook, it's not me, it's you. (Score 1) 107

And any projects I take on in the future will explicitly avoid/deny/lock-out Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and other big social media just because I don't see any value there anymore, for anyone. The collective "we" burned that village down to the ground. Oh well. Moving on.

I block them at my router.

Comment Re:Thankful for the privacy issues (Score 1) 107

But the "Fuck that" streak in me is REALLY strong. Turns out that has benefits as well as drawbacks. The jury's out on the question of which one outweighs the other.

Overall "benefits" are hard to quantify. But this attitude has definitely saved me real money. You want me to use your app to buy stuff from your business? Fuck that. You want me to use MY device on MY data to order food using a stupid QR code? Fuck that, I'll eat somewhere else. Loyalty card? Fine. Loyalty "account" tied to a phone number? Fuck that. Your business won't sell me a coffee for cash even though I have the exact change right here in my hand? I love caffeine, but fuck that.

Maybe I missed out on the most amazing coffee in the world. This is how FOMO works. But all these businesses trying to harvest PII just seems icky, even though I'm old enough to remember when everyone's name and address was written down in a big book and given away for free by the phone company.

Comment Re: It's bots and ragebait, thats why (Score 1) 107

I love my Facebook groups. I have weird hobbies. Laser cutting, cnc machining, programming microcontrollers in assembly, analog electronics, you get the point. Not many real people to talk to about this, but plenty of enthusiastic people online that want to help out.

Before facebook there were forums. Many of those forums migrated to facebook, and now the good hobby stuff is harder to search than a forum, and tied into Zuckerberg's dirty ecosystem. It's a step backwards.

Comment Re:Maybe... (Score 1) 81

there are still a lot more pilot screenplays than budget to produce all of them.

I think that's a good thing, judging from the sheer amount of utter crap that still gets through. We might have to agree to disagree on this one :-)

There have always been quirky low/no budget films though. Look at what Peter Jackson did before Lord of the Rings. More recently, those Finnish "Star Wreck" movies. Technology is only getting cheaper, and passion projects more accessible. There will always be plenty of video content from independent producers.

Comment Re:Maybe... (Score 1) 81

You're just describing life before ubiquitous broadband (and therefore simple video streaming). Now that most people have a fast internet connection, it doesn't matter if youtube goes away. If youtube goes away, streaming video won't disappear, some new ecosystem will grow in its place. Hopefully with less AI slop and attention whoring.

Comment Re:Maybe... (Score 1) 81

Under your proposal:
1. How would the producer of a video cover the cost of producing the video before it even reaches BitTorrent?
2. How would a viewer learn of a video that they are likely to enjoy?
3. How would the system work around users who "leech", or view the video without contributing to its decentralized hosting?

The same way it all worked before youtube.

Slashdot Top Deals

The computer is to the information industry roughly what the central power station is to the electrical industry. -- Peter Drucker

Working...