There's a wager I would take.
There's a wager I would take.
Hmm, maybe you might want to rethink that
A cheap barrel of oil that uses up groundwater will cost infinitely more once there is no food on the table thanks to rising water costs, which can only be offset by using UP the cheap oil to move water from somewhere else.
What the F ck is the Energy Dept. doing building nukes for the war dept anyway?
You would think after the de-regulation fiascoes of 83, 87, 2001 and 2007 NO ONE would claim Capitalism is self-regulating
Add in Bohpal, the hideous conditions of the Maquiladoras, the coal slurry poisoning of West Virginia, the toxic foreclosure mess by NON BANKS which were not regulated, the Ford Pinto, the debacles of patent trolls etc.. and by now any 'deregulation' drivel would be a laughingstock!
But not for the 1%, who see only barriers to higher profits
Check to see which state has the highest on-the-job per capita reported injury rate.
After all, isn't Texas a model for how America should be run?
I mean, no regulations of any kind (that can't be bought or bought off)
No worker safety laws (enforced)
No discrimination laws (enforced)
And no pesky College Grads not imported or created to fill a particular corporate servant slot.(or at least far fewer than the upper 45 states with higher K-12 to College grad rates).
Money being made everywhere, so what if people choked to death on Fracking fumes or starve on "contractor" pay rates?
Plover.Net is a free linux host for Interactive Fiction friends.
Plover.Net is sponsored by Textfyre, but at the moment, Textfyre is in a bit of a holding pattern financially. Therefore, I am now accepting donations. No one is required to donate, but I do appreciate it if you do.
Fiction is not much of a data source in support of your lack of rational argument woman-slaver.
But it IS established that your anti-abortion stance has the result of making women slaves to z/e/f
And finally, nothing remains of your argument but that you are espousing slavery for women.
This leaves us back at the beginning.
When is a Distinct, legal person present?
The 14th Amendment says " Citizens are BORN or Naturalized" and that is a good enough definition based on all the observed facts.
So, until such time as we have proof of the origin of human-ness, it will be the only valid description.
Like the right to FULL healthcare now that every MAN has that right
Thus the right endures until a Rightwing Bigot named Alito says otherwise
Your problem with the 14th is that you added words not in the 14th in order to make your case.
Felons, btw, who have served out their sentences,CAN NOT be stopped without reasonable suspicion, cannot be searched without probable cause and have all other rights besides those losses permitted under the 13th Amendment.
You failed to make a factual argument and succeeded in demonstrating only your zeal, not your grasp of facts.
Kim DotCom is small potatos to the NSA.
They aren't going to give away their shooting stand just to get a shot at him
Like I said, correctly, a Cancer is unique in precisely the same way a zygote, embryo or foetus is unique.
Except in the case of cancer, failure to remove the parasite is ALWAYS fatal to the host as opposed to the z/e/f which merely threatens her life.
But Roberts has some red-meat Catholics to appease and thus never even claims the 1st Amendment applies, only that RFRA applies and REFUSED to consider HER rights.
Do try not to imagine motives when you do not even understand the law (14th Amendment) that was flouted.