1928 Time Traveler Caught On Film? 685
from the I-hate-time-travel-stories dept.
|
|
I'd counter with the right to protect your business. Non-competes arise out of a number of valid reasons. They can be used to protect trade secrets. They can be used to protect customer relationships. Both of these cost a lot of money to create and maintain and there has to be some method of keeping your direct competitors from poaching them by bribing your employees.
That said, the law usually finds a balance and will usually strike down a non-compete that is too broad -- or in other words, defines "competitor" so expansively that it's impossible to find another job the utilizes your actual skills (rather than your former employer's trade secrets or customer relationships.)
Um, you forgot a couple of other possibilities:
5. Cut obscene executive pay, bonuses, and perks.
6. Fire bloated middle management (and bloated middle managers)
And most shareholders hardly count as "consumers", although I suppose you're right, there might be less consumption of luxury cars and second homes. Somehow I think that's a reduction in consumption we can live with.
So it's not my firefox/windows/router/isp dns cache being poisoned and directing me to a government controlled evil Google clone?
The other possibility was the evil overlords were stopping me from to figuring out how to mount my pirated copy of F.E.A.R. (Yeah, someone lost disk 5/5 of the legitimate copy.)
Dealing with the problem of pure staff accumulation, all our researches ... point to an average increase of 5.75% per year. -- C.N. Parkinson