Why would that matter for a web browser? Is Edge connected to the OS on some fundamental level again like IE? Regardless of them sunsetting Win7 too early, it would be shortsighted not to have it working on the OS with your largest install base.
If 1.7 is the norm for accidents at the amount of miles logged, 14 is clearly well more than 3 standard deviations from the norm. My guess is that while the Google car is legally compliant, it operates in such a manner that it causes disruptions or disrupts the standard situational awareness of drivers. IE: They stop too far back at a light and don't jimmy forward like most people do. Given a red light from a moderate distance, they coast a long distance and only apply braking at the end
... or the opposite and gradually brake excessively long—both of which throw off peripheral situational awareness. (AKA those times where the person in front of you is braking and so you check your rear-view for a moment and glance back only to find they stopped a lot farther back from the car in front of them and you have to tap your brakes quickly, etc. It doesn't seem like much, but tenths of a second matter.)
But are they? Where is the cost of all the lakes for recreation and other wildlife drying up? Where is the cost of kicking up giant dust storms and causing health problems, destruction of the land and other (previously) renewable resources being irreparably harmed? Etc. They are clearly NOT paying the true cost if its still somehow economically feasible to grow almonds and corn in the desert in CA.
The solution lies in internalizing the costs of bringing in the water instead of subsidizing it. People are certainly able to move into the area then—with the understanding that they will either have to live in a way that uses less water, or pay through the nose to sustain a lifestyle not suited for that environment.
They're already pulling in water from as far afield as Colorado. Is it really practical to build a water pipeline across 2/3 of the country just so farmers can grow crops that aren't suited for the location?
How much dirt would be required to shield from all/most of the radiation? Yes, manual labor requires more oxygen, but worst-case scenario, they use shovels and pile dirt on an aluminum dome or such for some initial shielding?
What scheme would that be? You can buy the game for as low as $30. Earning your way into something like a Hornet has been planned for a handful of days and something like a Constellation about two weeks. Buying massive capital ships won't necessarily do you any good, because you won't be able to afford the maintenance, fuel, and equipment costs to even fly the thing at release. All you get is the base hull with basic fittings. Ships also fulfill certain roles, so there is far far more lateral mobility in hull purchases than vertical. It's been my perception that the more vocal people are about doomsaying Star Citizen, the less they actually know about the game. And that's not to say it's even going to be a huge success—there are a lot of uncertainties related to seeing all of the various modules/systems to the game come together as one cohesive whole. But they've been making consistent progress, and while their have been some delays, they are explained and fall within the usual scope of development uncertainty.
I finally got my dad to stop paying full price for his dialup account almost 15 years after he got cable internet. He now pays $3/mo through the same provider for just a "business email account" that forwards his old address (which was his sticking point). And the kicker—they had long since given up on updating the old email service, so it still only had 25 MEGABYTES of storage space. The new account has like 10GB and is probably ran through the Gmail backend. He still couldn't tell the difference when I asked him if he was logging into his email via the web login or the standalone email application though, of course.
Don't remind me of the horrors of WORKING at CompUSA and having to restock that giant aisle of floppy disks every week...
Ironically enough, Japan is supposed to have their maglev trains running on the TokyoOsaka route less than 13 years from now. 40 minute trip.
I think the issue is more that the US turns HSR into a political point, so it gets mired in a nightmare of red tape. Whereas in other areas of the world, more or less, it gets built faster and without quite as much largesse.
That may be true, but there is something to be said for not having to be behind the wheel for those 6 hours. Train accommodations tend to be roomier than plane or bus, as well. People on business trips could take care of emails and preparations and arrive well-rested rather than restless and sore. Assuming this line has track priority, you would also get there in half the time or less.
I'm the opposite. I always would rather pay more for a quality product, than deal with buying it twice and usually having less overall satisfaction the entire time. It's actually cheaper in the long run.
Might they need revision? Sure. But part of taxi service is the social wellbeing consideration that they must operate at all hours, and to all areas of a city. If Uber is allowed to skirt any law they want and run conventional taxi services out of business, I hope you like having to pay $100 for a taxi ride home from the bar at 3am, or flat-out can't get a ride at all, because nobody wants to drive to X area.
This is where I then call Bullshit on anyone actually getting Windows 95 or 98 to run for 49 days. My average uptime before bluescreen was around 2 days...