Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Dead on Arrival (Score 1) 174

"I agree. Also, if people will shell out $700 for the iPhone, there will be plenty of buyers for a VR headset."

Ah, here is the central point. Charge what the market will bear! Everyone has been dreaming of working VR for 30 years now. The pent up demand it outrageous. If you hear a price that makes sense, it's too low.

Comment BS alert (Score 1) 157

"By adapting a lean approach to government, the amount of savings that can be realized by improved efficiency will eliminate the need for wholesale changes to foundational policies."

The line which amounts to "We will save so much under my administration that I will give you all this pork for NO COST!" has been used before, and it was bullshit back then.

If you are cynical, you should avoid this line because other cynics (cynical about government? this is a large population) will see your BS clearly. If you actually think you can pull this off then you should recognize that this is not low hanging fruit, it's not easy to do, you should structure your planning to not depend on your ability to do this.

If this is some sort of meta-joke at the expense of politics and campaigns then carry on.

Comment Re:You don't get it, do you? (Score 1) 161

"When you're in public, anyone can recognize you whether it be man or machine. Anyone can take pictures of you and what you are doing. There is no concept of "privacy" when you are in public."

To quote a /. comment I once saw (thanks, "fuzzyfuzzyfungus"), "most of your protection has always been logistical." "Privacy" in public has been available for a long time. Previously impossible actions were never considered, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be prohibited.

As expanding technological capacity tries to undermine expected privacy don't feel like there is any conceptual mandate to accept it.

Comment Re:It was an app on a WORK-Issued Phone! (Score 1) 776

"I was mulling that over after I posted, but after some thought I think that ends up being OK also as it's easy enough to claim your car blocks cellular signals really well or just were in a bad area..."

Pragmatically, this is probably a nice day-to-day response. But really, nobody should have to lie about things like that. It's good that someone can hash that out.

Comment Re:It was an app on a WORK-Issued Phone! (Score 3, Informative) 776

GP Said:
There are certain off-work things that an employer should know about - witness the guy who intentionally flew the airliner into the mountain and killed all on board - when it can affect their on-the-clock performance

You said:
It's worth noting that the situation you cite has happened exactly once in all recorded history

Not to be contrary, but pilot suicide is not brand new.

Comment Re:Scientifically driven politics (Score 3, Insightful) 347

So the politician is worried that the scientists are so politically motivated that they can't do good science?

Here, an apt quote from the Bible:
Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Matthew 7:5

Submission New Privacy Threat: Automated Vehicle Occupancy Detection->

An anonymous reader writes: The Electronic Frontier Foundation is warning against a new potential privacy threat: cameras that look instead cars and try to identify the people inside them. This technology is a natural combination of simpler ones that have existed for years: face recognition software and road-side cameras (red light cameras, speeding cameras, license plate readers — you name it).

"The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), a government umbrella group that develops transportation and public safety initiatives across the San Diego County region, estimates that 15% of drivers in High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes aren’t supposed to be there. After coming up short with earlier experimental projects, the agency is now testing a brand new technology to crack down on carpool-lane scofflaws on the I-15 freeway. ... In short: the technology is looking at your image, the image of the people you're with, your location, and your license plate. (SANDAG told CBS the systems will not be storing license plate data during the trial phase and the system will, at least for now, automatically redact images of drivers and passengers. Xerox’s software, however, allows police the option of using a weaker form of redaction that can be reversed on request.)"

Link to Original Source

"You must have an IQ of at least half a million." -- Popeye