Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:is the old spec obsolete/replaced then? (Score 2) 47

Ah!

> Dropping the protocol-level session doesn’t force your application to be stateless. If your server needs to carry state across calls, mint an explicit handle from a tool and have the model pass it back as an argument. We found this works better than session state hidden in the transport - the model can see the handle and thread it between tools.

Comment is the old spec obsolete/replaced then? (Score 1) 47

Most of my MCPs require context and are not stateless. A gdb mcp needs to hold on to a debugee. Multi step operations will require context like open, edit edit close.
So something need to hang on the 'other side' to these contexts. Yea the 'server' implies this, I understand but who then manages the live of the instance of the local MCP? This is notoriously left for the harness implementer and notoriously is done differently in each. Some are local to session, some are global and shared between sessions, hence mixing contexts possibly.
Maybe there is a need for local/tools MCP-like spec?

Comment Re:And they will know how? (Score 1) 119

Hmm - no my experience. Almost the opposite. Structuring the code is often hard for lazy humans. I see a lot of very well structured code from AI and this is more a telltale of AI. Good comments as well though their pedantic correctness is again purview of AI. (Mostly C++ and Python on my side).

But alas, by this flat refusal do they not shoot their feet off? There is a lot of good this tool can do. Rather, just penalize submitting AI slop as it burns reviewers energy?

Comment Re:5th? (Score 1) 218

I am sure you are ignorant as fuck in many areas as well. My goodness!

As I replied to others here, i realized 5th protects 'mind state' that is any information that necessarily require you to produce. This include passwords and pins, codes and locations of things. So phone is not protected. Unlocking it with password or pin is because you have to produce these.

Comment Re:5th? (Score 1) 218

Yea, after some research: the 5th protects your brain - that is pins/passwords etc. you'd rendered and these would lead to self incrimination. These necessarily you'd have to 'retrieved' from your brain. Apparently, they can unlock the phone legally with your face and perhaps with fingertip. So the advice was to power off the phone so the pin is necessary. However, not unlocking the phone would make them to impound it for some time, weeks likely. They still have to make a 'reasonable cause' to do so, and for the phone to be force opened they'd have to have a judge warrant. But since 'reasonable cause' is not longer reasonable in this country, they will make your life unconvinient by holding the phone.

Comment Re:I'm with the authors and publishers (Score 1) 109

This may be but current copyright law may not account for this particular sentiment - they will unpack the training into current language in the law and see what matches. If the "sentimental" request like above does not then it will be rejected and well you can try to augment the law.

Slashdot Top Deals

Uncertain fortune is thoroughly mastered by the equity of the calculation. - Blaise Pascal

Working...