Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Is aggression really survival+ for tech. societ (Score 1) 532

The costs of the big powers going to war is just too high for everyone (rational) to bear. So instead we trade, more or less peacefully.

Oddly enough, Saga depicts a war with costs along those lines. As a result, both sides "outsource" the conflict and have the native populations of other planets fight on their behalf.

Comment Re:Actually (Score 2) 532

... the downside of inducing passivity into a population. Aggression is ultimately what gets people out of bed in the morning instead of just remaining immobile and dying of thirst.

I'm waiting for the sequel, where they learn from their mistakes and directly induce passive-aggression into the population instead.

Comment Re:Is aggression really survival+ for tech. societ (Score 1) 532

How about, two space faring species meet, trade technology, form a conglomerate socieity which is greater than either of them would be alone, culturally richer, with every individual in both societies better off?

Congratulations. I think you came up with the plot of the first sci-fi movie that nobody would bother to torrent.

Comment Re:Creepy (Score 2) 193

Change this gene in something with a larger brain and you could create animals smart enough to deserve human rights. At that point the only ethical course of action is to give them said rights. The problem is the lack of a proper legal framework for such. ...

We need to start defining legal rights for intelligent, non-human entities immediately.

Totally not necessary:

  1. Wait until animal brains improve some
  2. Have them pass the bar exam
  3. Now the burden is on them to define and argue the appropriate legal rights
  4. Continue to improve animal brains
  5. Legal framework is now in place once they reach the appropriate level of intelligence
  6. Prosper!

Comment Re:I've got this (Score 1) 400

when you've decided to use someone else's resources, be it Facebook, YouTube, or even Geocities, to host or distribute it, only to find they object to being used by a horrific terrorist organization.

Or AT&T, Cox, Comcast, Verizon ... the only difference is that you're paying money to the latter. If they similarly object, what's to stop them from preventing you from using their (network) resources?

Comment A semi-related issue (Score 2) 495

I'll reiterate how grateful I am that cell phone charging -- and as a side effect, data transfer -- have been standardized, thanks to the EU mandating the Micro-USB connector and voltage standard. It's made life easier for pretty much everybody worldwide who owns a cell phone. Maybe it's because countries that culturally emphasize improving the quality of life, have their services change in ways that improve the quality of life.

Comment Maybe it's a good thing (Score 1) 667

At the 43:25 minute mark, President Obama is supposed to say “I’ve heard some folks try to dodge the evidence by saying they’re not scientists; that we don’t have enough information to act. Well, I’m not a scientist, either. But you know what — I know a lot of really good scientists at NASA, and NOAA, and at our major universities. The best scientists in the world are all telling us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we do not act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration, conflict, and hunger around the globe.”

Instead, the entire section is skipped. Obama’s comments resume with “The Pentagon says that climate change poses immediate risks to our national security. We should act like it.”

Maybe their expectation is that the appeal to military authority will carry more weight than the appeal to a scientific one?

Slashdot Top Deals

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...