I second that. Firebird is nice, but PostgreSQL is better.
I don't think it needs to provide a speed increase. I like it for the comfort and have used it for 15 years for that reason alone.
Although many people claim they do realize a speed increase, I didn't. So, I was simply hypothesizing that the reason I didn't notice a speed increase is that I can type as fast as I can think with either layout. If I wasn't putting sentences together in my head and then typing them, but rather typing pre-authored content verbatim, I'm sure I could type much faster than I do.
I know both QWERTY and Dvorak as well and I have to agree with you on your point of less fatigue. Your fingers don't move nearly as much as they do on a QWERTY keyboard.
However, I haven't noticed any increase in speed with Dvorak. Perhaps I might if I was a secretary and typing pre-authored material into a word processor, but I don't do that kind of work and I find I type as fast as I speak to myself in my head on both layouts.
I have heard some good things about Colemak, so maybe I'll learn that next and see if it beats Dvorak in the comfort area.
No, Macports does not work right for Python and PostgreSQL. For one thing, a couple of the libraries needed to do Python/Django programming don't compile correctly. For another thing, a lot of the libraries that are available for Python 2.4 in Macports are missing for Python 2.5+.
Macports is a good tool when it works, but it doesn't always.
Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?