I'm pretty sure you'll have a hard time trying to find a user who legitimately wants to pass arguments to command line tools by naming a bunch of files according to those arguments ;)

Bullshit. Roundabouts are used as the primary method of forming intersections between multilane major roads, and motorways in any country other than the US. They are perfectly capable of dealing with huge amounts of traffic.

And saves tarmac too, as the incoming and outgoing roads no longer have to deal with spikes and troughs in traffic, and can become substantially narrower.

The idea IIRC is not to disrupt the tornadoes. It's to disrupt the much more benign winds that interact to form tornadoes once they reach the mid west.

Right, because tesla haven't sold any of their $80,000 car that goes 1/5th of the distance, right?

Uhh, you realise that the other countries highlighted, where this is going better, are more socialist than the US, right?

The problem is, even if you have a job that you love (and I do), that doesn't mean that you want to (or that it's healthy to) spend every waking moment doing it. Variety is important for a healthy life.

This whole article is based on a fallacy - that Computer Science is teaching people to code.

This isn't what a Computer Science degree teaches you.

If you want to add a dozen orders of magnitude, you're talking about 2e12 minutes, i.e. 3800 millennia. Yet, people are happily living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear weapons are in general designed to consume all the highly radioactive things in them - after all, each of those radioactive elements is something that can be turned into energy for an explosion to occur. They don't generally have significant contamination issues.

Japan are probably worried that they are not in any way protected by the US nuclear program. They worry that the US would stop short of getting involved in world war 3 if China really did want to invade Japan. By building their own nuclear arsenal, they remove that possibility and maintain MAD with China.

Not quite - I'm also not defending them, but the consumer has the right to receive what was advertised, not what they thought they were getting.

If kingston advertise certain specs, and the new build still meets those specs, there's no false advertising going on.

What 3rd parties say about their device is neither here nor there, and any consumer believing what said 3rd parties wrote is completely liable for their own mistake in believing something other than what was explicitly advertised.

Let me guess, every single SSD you bought was a low capacity sand force controlled one.

The reason is explained in the video - when you're traveling at that speed, the loads you put through the suspension are huge. You don't want to have the suspension compressed before hand or it'll just break.

The world record requires them to do one run, turn the car (by itself), and repeat the run within 1 hour, so it definitely can turn.

No, this is simply the definition of a theory. If it's simply "I think that mice cause global warming", that's a hypothesis, but as soon as you add "you could test this by doing this, this and this, it predicts this result from the above tests" it becomes a theory. Once you do the testing it may stay a theory, or become simply wrong.