I pity your blinkered view of gaming.

I'll get on with working through my backlog of high quality PC games with gameplay experiences to match anything released historically and often graphics and sound that are far better.

Console ports are lazy and don't represent the high-end of PC gaming, but that doesn't negate the other options available, whether it's indie games that match the AAA games of just a couple of years ago, the AAA games that fully exploit PC capabilities or the esoteric games that reach a market previously unavailable and genuinely do different and interesting things.

Golden age of gaming? Maybe, maybe not, but I've never had access to so many such high quality games before.

I prefer the default option

0) If denominator is zero, provide abusive error messages to the caller for not checking their inputs.

ISIS aren't operating in Pakistan or Africa. Drones aren't dropping laser guided 500kg bombs in Iraq. Your question evades my point so I shall evade your question.

Hence basic shit like rollback capabilities and error recovery. You know, fundamental it practices that have been common sense for decades.

Shit, assume your batch always runs to completion and you've pretty much guaranteed it's going to fuck things up massively.

Working how? Antagonising a whole new generation of potential terrorists who see people sat in comfort 7000 miles away killing their relatives at a wedding is working to what fucking objectives?

Just because Americans aren't dying doesn't mean it's working.

Of course benchmarks are relevant. I don't give a fuck about size, running cooler is nice but frankly I want to know whether dropping $200, $300, $897 on whichever of these cards will run the games I play at the resolution I use or whether that same cash budget would buy higher performance from Nvidia.

Running the benchmarks will help confirm that the cards and their drivers can cope with the vagaries of multiple configurations and potentially draw out certain less effective combinations.

Benchmarks for the sake of stroking yourself might only matter for Fiji but they're fucking useful for making informed purchase decisions.

Call me picky but I would differentiate between actions mid battle and child decisions made in a quasi-jurisdictional context.

Dropping a bomb on someone to progress a military objective is perhaps a different class of behaviour to sentencing someone to crucifixion.

Indeed, they explicitly turn the fuckups into suicide bombers. Go over there, be no use to them, cause trouble, change your mind... Here's a vest, there's a checkpoint and remember, we know where your mother lives..

I'm not aware of the UK burning people alive or beheading them in the last 75 years in a non-military-conflict situation, although you're welcome to link to incidents of which I'm unaware.

If you start talking about the military use of incendiary devices then I'll ignore you.

Oh, so slaughtering innocent men is fine is it?

Anyway the women should fucking defend themselves, at which point it is a fight, thus negating your point.

Why outside the US? Why not redirect to the .us tld too?

Should the french redirect be to .fr or .eu? or .cunt?

Reddit are censoring the speech that they permit on their site, by removing that speech.

Why are you so opposed to using the term in that context?

Now that's just bullshit.

In a "Safe Space" men get harassed for stating simple facts. Women get applauded for being sexist towards men.

I tell you what a safe space really is: One where you can speak your mind and not be abused, silenced or forced out because you had the temerity to challenge the groupthink.

Reddit is not a safe space.

Yeah, I tend to ignore the factually incorrect and mod up the responses.

If I have 15 mod points I'll usually only use 2-3 of them to mod down, and that's normally people spamming, being genuinely hateful or unnecessarily trolling.

As an example, genuinely hateful would be using racial slurs in an aggressive and demeaning manner to insult or attack someone. On the flipside, discussing racial characteristics - even if unpopular or wrong - to try and make a point or discuss through an issue is something I'll avoid modding down, although I may mod up a response.

In action? I wont mod down, "black people are less intelligent than white people." I will mod up the reply, "All academic studies suggesting that's the case have identifiable flaws, particularly around how they measure intelligence." I will mod down "Fucking niggers are thick."

What are my personal views on relative racial intelligence? Doesn't fucking matter.

But it did get discussed, and it did reach a broad audience.

Shit, I remember when there weren't 3-4 websites you could hold a discussion on about anything.