To be fair, the report suggests they took the bug notification seriously and were discussing a patch.

So they're trying to protect the site's reputation AND their users' security.

Well, given the actions of traders are intended to exploit investors, fuck you.

I think a minimum hold period is perfectly acceptable, and that doesn't stop you trading, it just forces you to think before you trade.

Depends on the court. Judges tend to be more understanding towards a (well prepared) individual that can't afford legal help.

Even for something as straightforward as getting new tyres fitted, I just pay the professionals.

Sure, it's more expensive than doing it myself. But it gets done better, and it's not sufficiently more expensive to justify the grief and hassle of doing it myself.

Of course, they don't always get it right: Last week the two new tyres I had fitted were put onto the front wheels of my car, not the rear.

I didn't even look at the wheels, just noticed there was vibration at high speed. So I took the car back to the garage today, they spotted the issue, realised they'd thrown away my otherwise good front tyres, and as a result I now have the new tyres on the rear wheels as required, and a new pair of tyres on the front wheels too at no charge.

Good customer service, and worked out far cheaper than doing my own tyres, even though I'd have replaced the right ones to start with.

Doesn't San Diego also already have a few floating nuclear reactors?

Look you ignorant cunt I've already fucking told you how she acquired the games on her account.

You're either being deliberating obtuse or you're so fucking stupid you don't belong on Slashdot. Now fuck off and stop wasting my fucking time.

Fuck me, how do you even get fucking dressed in the morning.

At last an anti-judge comment on this article with which I can agree. The wigs are indeed a bit bloody stupid.

Worse still, they can decline to 'see' any barrister that isn't wearing one.

You ignorant cunt. This is nothing of the kind. Incidentally kowtow tends to have a k in it.

Do you have any evidence at all that the extradition request received by the UK was not received through the appropriate channels, with the appropriate sign-off from the authorised Swedish signatories?

Just that, if the request was received in accordance with the agreed protocol then it's valid, and must be treated as such.

Whether or not the Swedes behaved correctly prior to following those protocols is not something the UK can determine, and extraditing Assange does not prevent him from contesting Swedish process to get his case dismissed there.

Arresting Assange for breach of his bail conditions and extraditing him would not constitute an illegal arrest in the UK. Now fuck off you ignorant cunt.

Well fuck you and your total disregard for a fair trial.

Assange is in breach of bail conditions that are not considered excessively onerous, undue or demeaning. He's broken the law by failing to comply with those conditions.

It would compromise his right to a fair trial were he to speak beforehand with a judge that might preside over it. It would also compromise the public's right to a fair trial.

He's breached bail conditions in the UK. That makes him a fugitive from justice in the UK.

Whether he's committed a crime in another country is totally fucking irrelevant.

The judges can't listen to him because it would compromise their integrity - the absolute fucking opposite reason of your alleged moral corruption.

This isn't even fucking complicated, you're just skipping past the obvious in a blind frenzy to defend Assange.

There is however a fucking warrant for his fucking arrest for breach of fucking bail.

That's against the fucking law in this country you total fuckwit.

Don't forget the houses need support infrastructure - roads, sewerage, utilities, but also 224 homes will need a community hall, a couple of shops, a decent pub, a medical centre and/or dentist and (given this is America) at least seven churches.

Only a portion of the spend will go on houses.

Oh, it's trivial to work around - because unlike some Steam users $5 isn't half a day's salary for me. But until/unless someone is generous on her behalf she can not fully enjoy the platform or the games she owns on it.

Which has been the issue under discussion all along.

Perhaps I should have been more explicit. The use of a polygraph as a means of verifying veracity has no basis in reality.