Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:how many small businesses has Obama killed? (Score 1) 739

So, which Republicans voted for the ACA?...For that matter, what Republican support was needed to overcome a filibuster?

Apparently you don't know much about this history of what you are talking about. The answer to that question (which I think you suspected had no answer): the Republican Senator from Maine, Olympia Snow.

So, the Democrats created this whole crapload to satisfy one Republican Senator? Even though they didn't need her vote and she didn't wind up voting for it? And it's the Republicans' fault? Talk about delusional!

Comment Re:how many small businesses has Obama killed? (Score -1, Flamebait) 739

They opposed it because they oppose everything that Obama does. Whatever he does, they support the opposite. No one cared about Common Core originally, and it was implemented in 43 states. But as soon as Obama said it was a good idea, everyone on the started freaking out and saying it was the worst EVAH.

Funny, I remember Republicans supporting Obama on:

  • The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
  • The Water Resources Reform and Development Act
  • The Farm Bill
  • The Home Heating Emergency Assistance Through Transportation Act

  • The Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act

Nearly every key aspect of it comes from the GOP plan that Heritage came up with around 1989.

Right. A 1989 plan from a conservative think tank that never had enough support to even be proposed when Republicans controlled the House, Senate, and Presidency. That's a plan that "belongs" to the Republicans. That's the 11,000-page Affordable Care Act. Right.

I know Democrats are embarrassed by the plan, the plan's rollout, the plan's implementation, and the plan's deleterious effects on our country, but come on! Face the music!

Comment Re:how many small businesses has Obama killed? (Score 3, Insightful) 739

So, which Republicans voted for the ACA? Which provisions were inserted into the ACA to garner those votes? For that matter, what Republican support was needed to overcome a filibuster? Which provisions were inserted into the ACA to get Republican support in order to overcome that filibuster? Geez, just own up to the responsibility for what your party has done.

Comment Re:how many small businesses has Obama killed? (Score 1) 739

Are republicans so stupid that they can not see it's a Republican system?

Their memories are simply that short.

It has nothing to do with short memories. The overwhelming majority of Republicans never supported this plan. A single Republican governor of a liberal state supported a state-local version of this plan.

You know, until very recently, a Democrat President opposed gay marriage. So, does that mean that Democrats are so stupid that they can not see it's a Democrat ideal?

Comment Re:how many small businesses has Obama killed? (Score 2, Insightful) 739

Are republicans so stupid that they can not see it's a Republican system? Because as a Democrat I wanted a system closer to Canadian Healthcare as it works.

Because a single Republican governor implemented a similar system in a Democrat-controlled state, then automatically, this is a Republican plan that all (or even a majority of) Republicans across the nation supported? What a stupid statement! It completely flies in the face of actual facts.

Every single Republican in Congress opposed this plan. Republican voters overwhelmingly opposed (and still oppose) this plan.

The Democrats had complete control of Congress and the Executive Branch and they passed what they wanted to pass.

This clusterfuck is all on them. If it wasn't so terrible, it would be laughable that Democrats keep trying to pin the blame on the Republicans for this mess

Comment Re:Camps mixed up (Score 1) 739

From investors.com

Right after the Supreme Court's decision to lift limits on campaign contributions, Democrats and their left-wing supporters assaulted the decision as a boon to Republicans, "the party of the rich."

This of course is part of a far-wider narrative — slavishly repeated by largely unquestioning liberal media — that the GOP outspends Democrats on campaigns thanks to big-buck donors like the billionaire Koch brothers.

But, as it turns out, that's a lie — as big a lie, in fact, as "you can keep your insurance," "you can keep your doctor" and "ObamaCare will bend the cost curve down."

By almost every measure, in fact, it's the Democrats, not the Republicans, who are the party of the rich.

Start with Congress itself. Who are the wealthiest members? Well, there are 269 millionaires among Congress' 535 members. And most of them are Democrats.

And contrary to the hand-wringing on the left about the Supreme Court's 5-4 McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling Wednesday, Democrats far outspend Republicans on elections. It isn't even close.

According to OpenSecrets.org, from 1989 to 2014 rich donors gave Democrats $1.15 billion — $416 million more than the $736 million given to the GOP. Among the top 10 donors to both parties, Democrat supporters outspent Republican supporters 2-to-1.

But what about the villainous Koch brothers, those conservative plutocrats supposedly seeking to control American politics? They rank 59th on the list of big givers — behind 18 unions and No. 1 Act Blue, the massive left-wing fund raiser that gives only to Democrats.

Indeed, a recent book, "The New Leviathan," says donations to Democrats outstrip those to Republicans 7-to-1. How can this be? Democrat support soars when you include unions, universities, superPACs, nonprofits, left-wing interest groups, and — ready for this? — Wall Street (which overwhelmingly favors Democrats).

So Democrats don't really want to restrain money in politics. Just the money that goes to Republicans.

Submission + - Ex-CBS reporter claims Government agency bugged her computer (nypost.com)

RoccamOccam writes: A former CBS News reporter who quit the network over claims it kills stories that put President Obama in a bad light says she was spied on by a “government-related entity” that planted classified documents on her computer.

In her new memoir, Sharyl Attkisson says a source who arranged to have her laptop checked for spyware in 2013 was “shocked” and “flabbergasted” at what the analysis revealed. “This is outrageous. Worse than anything Nixon ever did. I wouldn’t have believed something like this could happen in the United States of America,” Attkisson quotes the source saying.

Comment Re:Discrimination (Score 1) 579

[*] Yep. Going by the results in the last Olympics, if women and men raced in the same marathon race and were cut off merely by time, there would be less gender imbalance than there is on wikipedia.

Interesting observation. However, just to be clear, in the Olympics marathon events, you can get several less than stellar entrants toward the bottom (think Jamaican Bobsled team ). In other words, the 100-or-so men in the event are not close to being the 100 best-in-the-world. But even with this diminished field, the best woman would have only finished in 64th place if competing against the men.

Slashdot Top Deals

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...