Comment Re:Philosophy should have never been.... (Score 1) 229
As far as truth is concerned, I have real issues with axiomatic systems, and would cite godel.
I don't.
More generally, there are in effect a lot of axiomatic systems out there. For instance the thermodynamics cult basically functions that way. But over time, with new science, they have to update the axioms. At that point, during the update, it is not an axiomatic system. And just at that point, they are dealing with something true.
In science, I completely agree. In philosophy, I believe that axioms create a foundation that without, you could not have any certain truths whatsoever. How do you resolve that conflict?
About truth more generally, for most people, including particularly reductionists, truth is a hard little ball of shit. Instead, reifying it a bit, truth is context sensitive. So objective truth is kind of a nonsense phrase.
I suppose you've identified which side I belong to. Though we do agree that objective truth is a nonsense phrase, only I think it is because it is a redundant term.