Good point...

Don't they have already? Isn't that what all those spy satellites do better and cheaper?

Maybe they just forgot to declare the random number object as static?

Is that not already weird?Now add the extra weirdness that you can't know what either envelope contains until you open it at which point whatever you find in the first envelope you will find the exact opposite in the other envelope. It's like if you had two dice, you can't tell what number is going to come up next just by looking at it. You roll the dice, which don't stop spinning until you focus your eyes on one die, at which point both stop spinning. You look at and note the result of the first die, then you look at the other die and it is always facing exactly the opposite of the first die. That's a bit weird.

>"dark matter" really has little more definition than "gravity generator" does it?
If you're making a pretty big assumption there in assuming that a "something" is the causative agent by virtue of it's being a thing in a specific place. The real cause of these gravitational effects could be something out of the scope of this assumption like the structure of the universe itself.

Wow and I thought it was all about the board game Risk.

There were radio controlled guided bombs developed and used (mostly anti shipping) in world war two mostly by the Germans but US also.

Well you have to leave the basement to fully appreciate where the basement is located. Otherwise it is just the all providing womb.

The interesting thing is that Apple really has become a mobile phone company. But if you cast your mind back to the time of the iphone launch, version 1, you might remember that their definition of success was to capture 1% of the global market. From that perspective Apple have done quite well.

It does still have chemical weapons, but yes it has signed the convention and is trying to destroy the remainder.

Having the worlds second largest stockpile of nukes tends to indicate that nukes = ok.

There are many indiscriminate weapons currently in use by the USA and rest of world:

• * Napalm
• * Cluster bombs
• * White phosphorous
• * Incendiary bomblets
• * Land mines
• * Claymores
• * Thermobaric bombs
• * Nuclear weapons (although there has only been one nuclear war so far, they are still part of the US arsenal, unlike chemical weapons).

I like your analysis except for the last point: they've stated they won't be going after the chemical weapons -- might cause more harm than good, spreading toxins through the environment.

>So did saddam, and he also gassed the Iranians, and we turned a blind eye. Only if by turning a blind eye you mean that you supplied Iraq with weapons, then yes.

Which is kind of the point of the UN after all, to prevent major powers going to war ever again.