Comment Re:I think people are missing the point (Score 2) 176
Use the web interface to download the file, then decrypt with a local copy of the encryption tool/key.
What they mean is they can't render a document on the web interface.
Use the web interface to download the file, then decrypt with a local copy of the encryption tool/key.
What they mean is they can't render a document on the web interface.
I would have intuitively said the other way around.
Since the gravity is so small I would have expected the motion of the smallest particles to be close to random, perhaps close to Brownian motion if you looked at the system over a long enough period of time.
I guess, even though there isn't much to pull the material together, once a small particle is in a crack or void it is very unlikely to ever escape and so the crack does eventually fill in, it seems to me that the process should exist but be much slower than when compared to the effect in a strong gravity field.
As you said, "Intuitively, which we all know is probably wrong"
The coal we use was created before bacteria evolved the ability to decompose trees, so it's not quite as simple as you seem to think...
bollocks
I'm not sure you understood the GP's point. In fact you seem to have interpreted it completely backwards.
Allowing the companies making the loans to go bust, rather than trying to protect them by not allowing Student Loans to be cleared by bankruptcy is the attenuation that you are looking for. It's sends a clear message to other companies loaning money that there are risks and that they should be filtering potential customers.
If economists had known in advance of one of the great depressions that it was going to happen, and releasing the results would of only sped-up the collapse, should they release the information?
The earlier the bubble is burst, the small the correction needs to be and the quicker the recovery afterwards can be. Knowing a burst will happen, it is ethical to make the information public as quickly as possible.
The tricky bit comes when you are 55% sure of a crash, but knowing that making those fears known publicly will definitely cause a crash. How sure do you need to be before it is worth causing a small crash to offset the chance of a bigger crash later on? 60%, 70%, 80%?
I would have thought that lack of crime was the goal of any law enforcement, not number of arrests. Although number of arrests is certainly an easier number to work out.
except that the idea of foreign workers being prefered over domestic, regardless of the reason, is a widely held believe.
Evidence that that is not the case would be just as worthy of publication
The number of brainfucks in Washington could be turned to our advantage.
We only need to introduce a single letter typo into a funding bill and for the brainfucks to not notice.
If there's a big bias against Americans in the results, publicize the heck out of it.
Regardless of the outcome, publicize the heck out of it. You don't get to hide the results just because they don't confirm your pre-existing bias.
Do you stand to gain, directly or indirectly, any benefit either personally, professionally, or politically, by whatever is being whistle blown on?
That is an extremely wide difinition.
Anyone whistle blowing is doing it because they want something changed, whether that is an improved working environment or a social/political change. That means they are indirectly benefitting and therefore by your definition no whistleblower is a whistleblower.
There will still be plenty of tickets to write for a long time, as until we are at 100% adoption, people will still break trafic laws
I'd imagine there is a network effect which would dramatically reduce traffic violations even with a realtively small proportion of fully automous vehicles on the road.
You can't speed if the car in front is doing 3 mph below the speed limit, you can't run the red light if the car in front is already slowing down for the amber. As the proportion of automous vehicles increases, people will get used a more conservative driving style and their driving style will change to compensate.
I don't know the proportion of traffic which would have to be automous to have an affect, but it will be far less than 100%
If we introduce life it becomes much harder to say any life we find in the future isn't just contamination we brought with us.
8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss