I would not assume "the motor does not wear" in EVs. They certainly will wear, but it is also very possible that they may last a lot longer than ICEs. We'll see in 10 years when we have a lot of cars with a lot of miles on them under a lot of different conditions. Body resilience & condition is a large part of resale value as well.

Very few cars are scrapped because of engine failure. Engines don't generally break unless you do something stupid to them.

Owning and wanting gadgets does not make you a "hipster".

I'm not even sure where you got that association from. Hipsters generally don't own anything interesting at all.

I generally agree with you. However, with :

3) how many entrepreneurs have 5 of 5 companies be successes?

If we guess at 1 in 5 companies being successful, then having 5/5 is about 1/3000. There are way, way more than 3000 entrepreneurs in the world. Just by chance there will be many successful people in the world, and past performance is obviously not a good indicator of future performance, using chance.

I'm not saying Elon Musk isn't talented, just that with an entirely random distribution you will get people who go from success to success.

God forbid letting users actually decide when to switch user interfaces, it must be done automagically.

I do notice they've got no videos of this robot going down stairs. That's _way_ harder than going up stairs.

The point is knowing that your consciousness exists doesn't help you know that other's consciousness exists. I know my consciousness exists, but how do you know my consciousness exists?

Gray to gray speed is not the same thing as response time. Manufacturers don't generally provide response time numbers, they have to be tested by third parties. The best LCDs are generally about 50ms or so.

Consciousness is by definition not provable by just about anything.

Once automatons mimic you, how would you show consciousness over their patterns?

I am not the French Government

Of course not, Louis XIV is.

User interface.

Any delay is bad, and response time reflects that. If you're _only_ taking photos and looking at them, then response time does not matter. Anything else, it's important.

Wait.... which monitors got better? Cheap monitors are undeniably better now, but I kept an old CRT around for ages because it was much better with some things, most importantly for me response time.

Response time has got much worse with the advent of anything but CRT.

Now, I'll agree that monitors got cheaper, and higher resolution, but not necessarily better. 120hz is rare now, too.

The Canon S3 has much better lenses than any smartphone. That's the difference, and it's the only real difference. If we could make lenses smaller, and light behave in accordance with something that is not physics, we'd all have professional class cameras now.

The megapixel drive, whilst valuable, has ignored the fact that you can't get all that much from a tiny lens. The megapixel count on smartphones is largely irrelevant now, because of the lens restrictions.

The best pictures are almost always taken by amateurs, because the best situations are so rare, and at least 99% of photos are taken by amateurs now.

Personally, I don't think there are many photos better than the crasher squirrel.

Not all malware is a virus, just about every virus is malware. Viruses aren't all that useful to people who are trying to steal your bank details, because they're indiscriminate.

Slashdot does not allow edits for a reason. Editing troll posts 24 hours afterwards makes for very disjointed discussion, and makes other people look stupid.