I didn't like it either. It left me flat, like I had wasted my time watching it. It somehow reminded me of Contact, and after reading the comments, I now understand there was some cross-fertilization from people involved in that. I didn't like the way Contact turned out either. Been a SciFi fan all my life. We had two great topics with these films - first contact, and time travel. I have read many great stories that employed these themes, but the movies had to turn them into some kind of supernatural, quasi-religious experience - something like Ghost, I suppose. I was very disappointed in these movies.

I kept thinking about all those corn stalks they were trampling - such a waste.

"Gravity waves travel faster than light." Interesting - hadn't heard of that. If they do, it must be by cheating - warping SpaceTime, to do it. As far as entangled particles communicating with each other faster than the speed of light goes, we cannot take advantage of that phenomenon, so we are safe from violating Causality.

I visited your fair state back early in the year. Drove from the Grand Canyon to Flagstaff then down the mountains to Phoenix - speed limit: 80 mph, just a-flying down those mountains! Had to keep up or would have gotten run over by trucks and vehicles behind. What a wild ride! Visited Phoenix, where it seems nobody works. Instead they all come down from the mountains to party there, best I could understand. Visited South Mountain and saw the stately Saguaro Cactus standing guard over that sacred mountain. They are so cool! Though you see them in every cowboy movie filmed anywhere, they only grow there in AZ, mainly there on South Mountain on the southern outskirts of Phoenix. After a night partying in the city, next morning took Highway 8 towards Yuma, then down for a brief visit across the border at Mexicali before heading back to California. Will never forget that trip, and hope to return some day. I think I like your state.

btw: You forgot to mention - there is no fucking daylight savings in Arizona.

The story at Ars has a video of an candid interview Kim Dotcom did with the press a couple of days ago... http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

I listened to the whole thing, and found it very interesting. Kim Dotcom gave fairly straight forward responses, and came off for me as an intelligent, not so bad guy. For sure it would be easy for us to envy his wealth, but IMHO he came about it by exploiting loopholes in the law, not by breaking the law.

Instead of pursuing Kim Dotcom to the ends of the earth (Sorry, NZers), why doesn't the US DOJ expend their effort prosecuting the crooks on Wall Street whole defrauded the whole world of a trillion dollars selling those bogus Credit Default Swaps that led up to the crash of 2008? Not one has been prosecuted, nor will they ever be.

I'm sure I'll get flamed for writing this as a driver

I won't flame you, but I would suggest being a taxi driver might motivate you to write a little FUD. Obviously, the existence of Uber is a serious threat to the status quo with taxi drivers. In fact this whole article is about how much owners of these medallions have to lose. Please bare with me a moment while I question something here...

You say...

Uber has succeeded in remaking the cab market and externalizing all equipment costs and liability to the drivers, all while actually even paying them (unbelievably) less than the chicken-scratch cab drivers already make, and all the while pretending they do something different than charge money for a ride somewhere. Many drivers are making 3-4 dollars an hour after vehicle maintenance, depreciation, taxes, water and snacks for passengers, and Uber's 20% and assorted fees.

.

If it was as bad as you say, nobody would drive for Uber. Yes, their fare is going to be lower than a typical taxi, and Uber gets their cut, but on the other hand, they don't have to pay a hefty "Medallion Rent". See this paragraph I lifted from a comment by LGW below...

.

You do realize many/most taxi drivers are part time, right? The normal system in most places means only the most successful drivers actually own a taxi. The rest rent by car by the calendar day, and pay a hefty sum for that. The result is it's normal to try to stay awake for as much of that 48 hours as possible, as it takes many hours of driving just to cover the fixed daily cost of the taxi, then sleep for a day or two, then repeat. This is not a system geared towards safety!

.

Does an Uber driver have to suffer like that? I doubt it.

How do they even know it was "Cox subscriber having IP address 24.252.149.211", as opposed to his neighbour who tapped into his WiFi?

Lest someone think this is a lame excuse, let me tell you my own experience...

The first month after I got the internet connection set up in my new place, my ISP noted my 64 gb data cap was exceeded, and they made a courtesy call to see if they could up sell me on more bandwidth. I was totally shocked, because I know my normal data usage would never come close to that limit. Somebody obviously cracked my relatively simple password and hacked into my modem. I immediately changed that to the longest password it would accept, and there has been no more data overages since. What do you suppose my WiFi was being used for? Could well have been for downloading copyrighted material, which certainly I hadn't been doing. What if the copyright police came after me for this? I would be pretty pissed off!

Agreed, except - this isn't even about people who download copyrighted material without permission. This is about allegations that people are downloading copyrighted material without permission. That's all - allegations. There was nothing proven in a court of law - just some scum bag outfit like John Steele & Co. called "Rightscorp" pointing their fingers at IP addresses that may or may not connect with people they are accusing of downloading.

Just teach them to Swype. For me it is faster than any other input method.

Who needs napkins? All you need is a good swipe from the back of your hand or your sleeve.

Hey, what's wrong with T & A?

I also think Cox should establish a reasonable handling charge for investigating and dealing with these automated complaints

Whoa - you don't want to go there! Cox treats Rightscorp's settlement notices to users as spam, which is exactly how they should be dealt with, but turns out many other ISPs are going along with this bullshit from Rightscorp. That got me thinking - why? My guess is that maybe they are getting paid - maybe in some cases, well paid. Seems logical to me that would make a good strategy for the copyright maximalists if they can show that most ISPs go along with their agenda. Then when they take an ISP like Cox to court it makes them look better. It's like Microsoft and their "Android patents" scam. They make every licensee sign an NDA so they can go around bullying other Android OEMs and tell them all these others are paying up big so they better pay up big too. In reality, in most cases we have no idea how much royalty was paid, if any.

"...this one just guides it directly towards your emmitter (and hands), which it will then presumably slice through without problems."

Yea but you would quickly learn to avoid sliding your hand up past the hilt guard. After you made a couple slips you would never make that same mistake again.

The Seduction

Imagine the world 10 or 20 tears into the future, when the IoT is becoming fully realized. Our homes and businesses have become a large network of every manner of "thing". Due to "network effects", the value of this technology and its ability to transform our lives has grown exponentially, way beyond what we could ever imagine. We are very bit as dependent on The Internet of Things as we were on the Internet of decades ago.

The Reality Today

The Internet, with all its wonders it has brought us, is out of our control. It appears there is no way to secure it. There is no end to hacks and vulnerabilities. Spam, viruses, malware, credit card breaches by the millions, military secrets stolen, loss of privacy on massive scale, DoS attacks, hacking into peoples web cams and microphones, entire systems p0wnd (Sony lately), billions upon billions of dollars in losses and damages. How can we go on like this? All the brilliant ideas of our best computer scientists to protect our computers and systems seem useless. The criminals are always one step ahead of us, no matter what we do.

If we could have predicted all the problems with the Internet as it is today, back when - would we have embraced it as we do now? It can only get worse with the IoT. Imagine when every day items start attacking you like some scene from a horror movie. It will become our worst nightmare.

We need to pause, step back, and look at the bigger picture.

Unfortunately, I have no answers. All I have are questions.

Thanks - that explanation really helps.