Why are campaign contributions allowed? Would it be possible to ban these? If not, due to the people 'in power', it seems like our system needs better checks and balances in this respect to better enforce the will of the people. Are people just voting in bad apples or is the entire political system corrupt? Does a majority of the people really believe in the things that are occurring, or has control been taken away from those in the general public?

Should the legal system really be messing with things like this? Sure, it is annoying, but I don't think that laws should be created because some dude doesn't feel like turning his volume down during commercials. Laws should only maintain peace, if anything, and I don't think that this issue is causing many deaths.

Based on the documents contained in the parent post, it sounds like your company or organization would be acting as a government contractor. As with similar contractor work, you submit a full proposal with bid. This in no way relates to how an app store may work.

PDF with full details available at:
https://www.fbo.gov/spg/ODA/DARPA/CMO/DARPA-BAA-12-11/listing.html

Press release at:
http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2011/12/05.aspx

So... they could in theory select a target, 'donate' money to them, and force them to pay chargeback fees. What if they donated money to a single bank? Would the banks start charging each other charge back fees?

Michigan, Washington, Florida and North Carolina

Who is this /, crowd you speak of? Must be some rebellious script kiddies. Get off my lawn!!!

Yes! I could reproduce all of the works of Shakespeare in nearly zero time on a single computer. All I would need to do is reduce the comparison from 9 characters to 1 bit. A random bit generator could randomly reproduce a bit. I would then compare that one bit to a Shakespeare work and save it if it matched. Heck, we could 'optimize' this and just flip the bit if it didn't match, being that it's the only other possible permutation. Bam, O(n). My point is, as I believe others have noted, the saying is referring to the comparison of a single monkey's output with the only validation being that the monkey reproduced said Shakespeare work in it's entirety. Validating a subset of the work is essentially the same as the validator writing the work, not the monkey.

Free? where?

So if I understand you correctly, we need to devise a ram-stack rotisserie. Wendy's may be able to provide guidance, at least regarding a double stack implementation.

...is it really infinite?

I, for one, welcome our new genetically immune overlords!

PS: Farewell mankind.

I don't even want to think about solving a cube with n sides. Not to mention, how a cube ever got n sides to begin with...