If your discussion can't take place without making someone feel bad, why should we allow it to take place? Not a politician or celebrity whose stepped into a debate, but someone who just happens to be overweight because they're undergoing chemotherapy for example.

And scream whatever amendment it is that jerks use to justify these acitons, I'm not a US citizen so I couldn't give less of a shit. I mean one of the amendments tells Americans to all shoot each other all the time - how's that been working out lately?

This whole idea that we'll have lost something as a society if we can't insult random innocent people is so retarded it hurts my head.

Let me just rearrange your own words for you.

"But by what definition of the word 'harassment' apply?"
"Embarrassing photos / comments about people."

Do you understand now? As my mother used to say, if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all.

It's not hard.

^This. To every little Reddit fuck who has come here today to complain that "mommy stopped my fun game". Either understand how the game isn't fun or just watch us slap you like this over and over again until you do.

You've chosen to associate with a group that preaches hating a certain type of person. Your goal is to hurt other people.

Now you're crying because someone decided to fuck that off into oblivion, and trying to justify your original actions as giving advice and information to people?

LMFAO. You spend your time hurting people on purpose.

Pretty much the one thing that is guaranteed to have people retaliate in kind.

Do you see how that works?

So no, you are not allowed to speak. In fact get the fuck off the internet, we don't want you here.

Consciously and actively deciding to deliberately upset someone for your own amusement... isn't your fault?

Go back to Reddit kid. You aren't wanted here at all. This place is for adults.

What was the exact amount?

Correct. Only yanks 'sit' exams.

That's right, and if you multiply it by, say 100 million downloads, to keep it simple, then they have wasted about 3 years of time and 10 million dollars worth of disk space for no reason. It's likely to be an order of magnitude or even two higher than that over the lifetime of the product.

It's like saying that every time Office is slow or buggy then only a few minutes of time or pages of text are lost. If you multiply that by the amount of usage it's had in the last decade or two, the amount of lost productivity across every sector - government, education, finance, logistics... is huge.

We would all be driving nuclear powered hovercars today were it not for MS Office.

Yep, we haven't figured out how to allow a user to drag an Explorer window that's looking for something on a network, but we have built directly into our OS support for a third-party program to talk to fourth-party hardware.

We still haven't figured out a reliable algorithm that can draw things inside specified a rectangular region of the display, but you can run Android apps and have their GUIs splayed out across the display like a grisly sacrifice.

We still haven't figured out just how much we alienated our customer base by trying to force all computers to be tablets, but we are sure _this_ version of Windows is gonna be the one that everyone installs on their desktops.

So they've spent some more time muddying the purpose of their OS and they want us to bring our efforts to their platform, after years and years of making sure nobody could take their efforts under Windows to other platforms?

Good luck there MS, I for one will not be supporting you.

I run a project?

Would be great if we can also force them into giving downgrades like they had to with Vista. If I can get a free Windows 10 and downgrade it to Windows 7 my OS needs (from Microsoft) will be met permanently.

Case in point: http://community.skype.com/t5/...

slightly? Blowing poison gas into the air I breathe is not "slightly"

Panic much?

Don't you dare drive your car past me when I'm smoking.