It would be 100% asian without the cap. There is no ideal solution.

I think you just prefer that we can't understand the universe, because it means the things you hope for are possible. It's very common these days, and it's been increasing the more we come to a complete understanding of how things work. Turns out, even the universe isn't that complicated or mysterious.

Good intent cannot circumvent the laws of the universe.

How long will america and other nations aging electrical grids be able to keep up with the demand and load *if* EV's ever become economically practical for the majority of people? 1 billion cars is a lot to replace. What happens to them and their toxic waste? Not to mention all the new coal plants we'll have to build to keep up with demand. Nuclear isn't an option as long as people are scared of things they can't see or perfectly understand.

So several million dollars for some data that might be used for a phd thesis? No wonder nobody takes nasa seriously.

More interesting, but ultimately doomed to fail. He should have stuck with pure stealing people's money, instead of subtly doing so.

Elon Musk just cannot run a successful business.

seriously, this is retarded.

How much money did they waste to establish "People learn things"?

You're not making any sense. I expected more than just redditors on slashdot.

An inanimate object? Take some time to think of a cogent analogy.

Then i await the charges levied against charlie hebdo. But alas, the double standard of ideology cares not for justice.

It is not the fault of the person that the cops acted the way they did. If that is true, then we must accept that charlie hebdo is responsible for the deaths it caused with its free speech. It's a double standard.

Congress shall make no law abridging the right to free speech. Any law which does so is automatically void.

If people being hurt as an indirect result of a statement or expression is condemnable, what are the charges being levied against charlie hebdo?