Comment Re:You missed a couple memes, there (Score 1) 8
I suppose I could offer a link to a picture of the overall summary, a cesspool. Would that enhance your nostalgie de la boue ?
Comment Re:Bottom line (Score 1) 44
Would you like a biscuit or a bone in reward?
I just want you to stay beautiful. Is that so wrong?
Journal Journal: Admiring the Administration's efforts to play drums and guitar simultaneously 8
. .
Breitbart has since learned that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) used this same article to defend itself in the case filed by the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Comment Re:Bottom line (Score 1) 44
You try so desperately to connect those two unrelated concepts; apparently under the belief that you can force them into association by repetition alone. I would point out to you that there were actually people from the original occupy (wall st.) movement who actually wanted to run against President Lawnchair but I don't expect that would slow you down any.
No no, the desperation is 100% on your end, I assure you.
I would be genuinely interested in knowing why you are so sure of this.
Strong correlation with consciousness during the previous 6 years, I suppose.
So, then, ~35% of the public - or 80%+ of your own party - supporting impeachment are sufficient in your mind to venture down this road? Not many people would ordinarily consider such a group to be an accurate assessment of "the public".
Your continued desperation to attach ownership of the GOP to me is. .
If the GOP are invertebrates, then the democrats are - at most structurally - pond scum. They haven't stood for much of anything as a party in over a decade.
Aw, c'mon, boss: both stand for the increase of Federal power.
What I did was still more than you have done to attempt to fill in your cavernous gaps of knowledge.
Oh, OW! Oh, that hurts! Oh, the suffering! Imma go cry now.
Journal Journal: #Boom 6
Comment Re:where's the money?! (Score 1) 213
Autistic Coprolite Miners.
Comment Re:Bottom line (Score 1) 44
A pass for, or to do, what exactly?
Um, to. .
He hasn't exactly done much since. Not that he did a whole lot before...
So, exactly how "[absurd" was my "analogy]", please?
So then are you done calling for impeachment?
As I was explaining to my dad during the daily call on the way home, the way politics works, you don't bring anything to a vote unless you know what the outcome will be. While, in a absolute sense, I don't doubt that orders of magnitude more information exists than would be needful to demonstrate "high crimes and misdemeanors"
Contrary to some less than informed opinion, "high crimes and misdemeanors"--the legal standard for impeachment--refers not to indictable criminal offenses but to profound breaches of the public trust by high-ranking officials. Once the standard is understood, it becomes easy to see that the president and his underlings have committed numerous, readily provable impeachable offenses. Yet, even if a president commits a hundred high crimes and misdemeanors, impeachment is a non-starter unless the public is convinced that the president should be removed from power. The real question is political: Are his lawlessness and unfitness so thoroughgoing that we can no longer trust him with the awesome power of the chief executive?
Thus, November can be reviewed as a No-Talent Rodeo Clown Referendum: the same fickle electorate that returned Pres'ent Obama to the White House could just as easily. .
I couldn't get the article to load
Google cache?
Comment Re:where's the money?! (Score 1) 213
Ain't Chargin' Much
And Code's Making
Amazingly Classy Millionaires.
And Code's Making
Amazingly Classy Millionaires.
Comment Them Crooked Vultures (Score 1) 1
John Paul Jones on bass. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U9_QM4HhIE&list=PLgL-iwzsjGiykZ0fQA9iRkHGSa5DH8alt Out of frickin' control, man.
Comment Bottom line (Score 1) 44
The voters gave #OccupyResoluteDesk a pass in 2012. Until such time as the voters give the GOP such a commanding majority that substantial action is possible, all the impeachment talk is just so much hormonal whinging. What really must terrify the GOP is that, given such power, the silent conservative majority would expect them to accomplish some no-kidding reform. Which is why the GOP prefers the sweet passive aggression of letting the IRS crush the Tea Parties.
To your "Health Insurance Industry Bailout Act of 2010" point, you may find this interesting.
To your "Health Insurance Industry Bailout Act of 2010" point, you may find this interesting.
Comment You so funny! (Score 1) 58
When you actually explore the project, you'll quickly learn that you just made the quintessential ignorant redneck statement. Stay beautiful!
Comment Re:What's your point? (Score 1) 29
Look at what you wrote:
It requires no intellect, and certainly no "morality" of any kind. It is a natural predator and prey relationship. And all attempts to regulate it have been quite farcical at best. Can't expect much different when sociopathy is the dominant trait of those we support.
Examples of cooperative ecosystems abound. Indeed, things veer into "sociopathy" when resources are constrained, which is an odd word choice following your 'no "morality" of any kind'. If it's all amoral, how do you gauge a sociopath? (Asking for a cereal killer).
Comment Re:It's actually worse than that (Score 1) 49
They haven't reached the magic number 36, but they are seriously working on it. I figure another 10 years.
Comment . . .raise cash? (Score 1) 44
Or are you going to sit there and pretend that there isn't a whole lot of opportunism going on?
Comment Re:Rule of law (Score 1) 58
I think that the Convention of States is the least-worst answer.
