Which federal government?

Would it have hurt to mention which government ?

Fair enough. But if you think you are interesting enough for the NSA to be watching you (so much so that you download and use this tool) you may have just done enough to make you interesting enough for NSA to watch you.

Employees having been whining about their boss' incompetence since the beginning of time. A large percentage of them reckon they can do their bosses job, and better.

And then one day they have to do a bosses job. That's when they find out that there's way more to it than they imagined.

I don't think I will ever consider music as videos. That is what YouTube does; videos. Music is sound, it is not visuals. This is a fundamental difference that is not up for redefining.

Yes these things happen all the time. Which is why anyone with a shred of professionalism and experience doesn't add crap like this to a paper that will be read by external people at some point. If you have a habit of doing this, it will catch you out eventually.

FTFY.

So the headline should be;

Big Data guess quite well when the average employee may quit a job, on average, usually.

But that doesn't make as good a click-bait.

Wikimedia is not Wikipedia.

Recruitment companies are two-faced liars and parasites who play the company off the employee. Never forget this when dealing with them from either side.

Maybe AC is not the original poster?

What music and art is "fine" is an entirely subjective opinion, so this is a meaningless statement. Personally I find a fair proportion of jazz a turgid cacophony. Why would I subject my children to that?

Give them whatever they enjoy and whatever will expand their horizons.

Why guess when you can RTFA? Then you might get the right answer. Or was that not what interested you?

The pope says we have. "He created human beings and let them develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one so they would reach their fulfillment."

His problem is that he wants his proclamation to mean something to each individual, a sentiment safely within religions' comfort-zone. Yet evolution means very little for individuals, only to species. So he's come out with a fudge that tries to gloss over the distinction and invents these "internal laws" that pre-defines the direction of evolution towards an end goal of fulfilment. That's not what evolution is.

So according to the infallible one, either I have reached my fulfilment, or human beings have. Which one is it? And how is this distinguished from a god with a magic wand?

You might think this is a step forward, but his proclamation still makes a nonsense of evolution. Evolution has no "internal laws". We have not reached "fulfilment", or indeed any kind of end point to the journey.