No because it's too easy to look up this information. Figure it out for yourself.

Good luck with 4k. Also, how many people are streaming moves over your piddly 6 Mbps DSL....Think before you post.

Guilt? Let's try gut. They taking Billions of tax payer dollars in the name of rolling out broad band and have not done that. Companies should be broken up.

Because Google is available in every market and there's no barrier for Google entering these markets *eye roll*

You might want to read Google petition to the FCC to reclassify ISPs as Title II common carriers. This will allow Google access the utility poles to run fiber which in many cases they do not.

Think Potsy think....

I know. People need to stop using the term "disruption." They don't know what it means and aren't using it correctly. Just stop.

It is an unbiased view. Those are facts based on employment research.

Pay your taxes hippie.

So I take it you never get a raise at your job. Good for you.

LMOL Here's a thought, ask them. Seriously you really don't know how government works do you, let alone IT procurement. There's things called budgets and upgrade cycles. Most companies have a budget and a upgrade cycle where you replace equipment. Perhaps you haven't noticed the IRS budget has been slashed and continues to be cut. That's beyond odd since the IRS generates revenue for the Federal government and insures all Americans pay their taxes.

Right because those companies are tasked with collecting taxes and performing audits of all tax paying Americans *eye roll*

Actually it was in all the newspapers if you bothered to read.

Way to follow the heard Google....FYI it's also nice to know that you see no value in people, "they still use human agents"

Morons.

Wow, just wow.....

It's not causation since no experiment was conducted to measure this. It's a weak correlation at best, since again, no correlation study was conducted to measure this outcome. It was a meta analysis not an experiment. That's the limitation of the study. It should be touted as proving anything. What it does point to is an interesting of study, something that should be looked at.

I think a reasonable conclusion to be drawn is that prolonged sitting is associated with a number of bad health outcomes and that prolonged sitting should be broken up with breaks during the day.

And that's the problem, it's a crap conclusion. No one is going to develop type 2 diabetes if they are healthy. It's the inactivity and amount of food you eat. So indirectly you could say prolonged sitting contributes to this outcome. The article severely overreaches.