Exactly. This applies to "hard" sciences too. The jackass submitter couldn't get his head out of his ass long enough to read the article and understand the implication. One of the problems the article mentioned was journals not willing to publish null results and research that just replicates other research. That's rather important because you need more than one researching publishing similar findings to feel confident about the results. The other point is that some the results, though valid, were valid for very narrowly defined scenarios and therefore not generalization.
Yo Bruce66423, RTFA sometime.