Comment != google glasses (Score 3, Insightful) 65
Lets see, no camera, no motion sensors, HUGE and heavy... don't see where anyone would be comparing this to Google Glass.
Lets see, no camera, no motion sensors, HUGE and heavy... don't see where anyone would be comparing this to Google Glass.
Does this destroy the electronics ie make them no longer work until replaced?
Does this affect other things like watches, phones, pace makers and other medical equipment?
Would be an interesting oops... wrong vehicle or a innocent vehicle is in range when this is triggered.
Not sure why this is hard.... If you don't want a DRM car, don't buy one.
Perhaps you are more the exception than the rule here?
Imagine you are passing a vehicle with a big trucking approaching from the other direction and you pass a speed sign which reduces the speed limit
Dumb.
Confuses the heck out of the neighborhood (over heard at a block party it being mentioned). Even with a good signal and connected, it still says Disconnected
If they don't have them documented... good luck.
I think you would find a very negative reaction if you set up a Water bottling business at your house and started selling the water you get from utility company. Setting up hosting is similar in that you are using resources not intended to be used and are "selling" something that is not yours.
Setting up a Charging station and charging people to charge up their cars using electricity at your residential rates would get you the same response.
The Unlimited Data is a false promise, but I don't see how it has anything to do with Net Neutrality.
I don't know because I have not looked, but I'm sure that Google has a "Business Plan" for those that want to host just like Cox has a business hosting package.
That is exactly what they are doing though depending on the device the per month is different. Example
We actually mark on SPF checks on the outside but accept them. They then pass through a spam quarantine system which if they are SPF-FAIL or SPF-SOFTFAIL they are quarantined. Users can release them if they want to but they have to check their "Junk" reports to look for them or go to the portal itself. They have up to 15 days to release them or they are gone. However since these are a policy based rule, they can't white list senders that are messed up. Doesn't take long for a major vendor to learn they need to do email right.
Biggest problem is people with SPF records ending with ~ALL which basically means here is where we think our mail is coming from but if it is from somewhere else don't block it. Kind of stupid to not know where your email is being sent from. Especially annoying when a known company is setup like that that gets used as a phishing attack which is why we now quarantine SPF-SOFTFAIL now.
Nice to see...
you over paid for a lot of the stuff... $5 for 1.8A 5v MicroUSB PSU (includes cable), $6 16GB Class 4 MicroSDHC card with Sdcard adapter.... free shipping on both.... I use a WiFi USB Dongle ($12) no keyboard, no mouse headless... great little device. Have 3 of them.
If a site doesn't want Google to make money off of their content headlines... then they can easily opt out of having Google pick up their data and index it.
But NO... they WANT the exposure and get a cut too.... if the law is passed, cut them off. Simple
Places and things people should not be clicking on in the first place.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh