Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Atmosphere (Score 1) 117

The Santa Cruz atmosphere is certainly unique, it gives many people the heebie jeebies.

On any given Wednesday (farmers market) you will be bombarded by a litany of drug addled homeless people looking to score some food, cash, or drugs. It is a terrible blight on Santa Cruz and leaves a bad taste in the mouths of those who get out of SC. The streets are dirty, foul odors emanate from the alleys that act as both throughways for local workers and garbage repositories for the restaurants.

Another significant problem with SC is parking, the City owns almost all of it because the zoning allowed builders to do whatever they want, and the City supports the parking load for them. In other parts of the City you must have a given number of parking spaces for a given square footage, it's a zoning requirement, but not in the heart (downtown). So parking is totally jacked up and costs a fortune. If you're lucky, thieves won't target your vehicle. There is only 1 city owned lot that is free to park in anymore, they just added gates to the 3 story garage on Front and River streets.

When strolling down the sidewalks, commuting between the parking lots and work, you may be asked for a handout or assaulted by someone else's secondhand smoke. The City doesn't enforce it's own outside smoking ban, much less enforce the Medical Marijuana statutes, which leaves the rest of us to hold our breath while the dope head in front of us is toking on a pipe.

I have worked in downtown SC on 3 different occasions, and all 3 have left me with the same opinion: it's a dirty and does not convey the clean and inviting atmosphere that businesses -- and their employees -- expect. The sooner I can GTFO, the better.

Comment Redneck Interwebs (Score 1) 128

Their argument is stupid and pointless.

There are plenty of people who only enjoy watching honey booboo that have the interwebs, unfortunately the rest of us have to suffer the side effects of stupid management.

I'm really baffled how shows like 24 stay on the air for years, and shows like The Agency, Jericho, and Terra Nova get canceled?

I'm sick of the real catty housewives of the next urban location. I'm tired of Dodgy the bountiful hunter, and every lame "re-enacted" reality shows like Operacion Repo.

Funny thing, one of the biggest offenders was called "Real TV", but there was too much reality and they went to "truTV".

Reality happens in real life, there isn't anything "real" on TV, it's either streamed with factual errors and no supporting information, "produced", or "re-enacted", nobody show "reality" because it wouldn't be salacious or dramatic enough.

Comment Parallax Propeller (Score 5, Informative) 103

The Parallax Propeller is a great multi-core chip to get started with. The chip is $7.95 and has 8 cores running at 80Mhz. You can pickup the Quickstart board at Radio Shack for $40, including an overpriced RS USB cable (they normally retail for $25).

The Parallax Propeller is a much more economical way of getting started with multi-core programming. Parallax offers the PropTool, which provides SPIN and PASM language support. For C development you can get SimpleIDE which is a great IDE to get started with C programming on the Propeller, which uses a port of GCC.

Comment Re:Ugh, Ruby (Score 4, Funny) 362

Bravo! You have made the beginning of my day!

The title of my next newsletter:

Ruby: A language designed by programmers for non-programmers

Then followed by these illustrious titles:

Ruby: Non-programming for Programmers
Ruby: Unprogramming what you've learned about Programming
Ruby: Lobotomy required
Ruby: Brainfuck for the masses

Comment Apple's receipt verification is broken too (Score 4, Interesting) 142

I just reviewed the documentation for the receipt verification, and that process is broken too.

To summarize, you forward an opaque token to the appstore and verfiy success using a simple clear text status flag. This is fundamentally broken because the client doesn't authenticate the source of either piece of data. The original hack in this article is based on a Man In the Middle attack, their receipt verification system is vulnerable to exactly the same type of attack.

The lack of cryptographic hashing and authentication on the client side is a complete failure of Apple's API design. The first step should be message signing and authentication to ensure the server is who the server says they are. Apple is relying on SSL certificates for this role, which I feel is inadequate. The SSL Certificate Authority system has been broken for a long time and reliance upon them to assure authenticity is a Bad Idea(tm).

The concept of centralized CAs is good in theory, but recent events have proven that CAs are easily corrupted by economic, political, and technical means.

Slashdot Top Deals

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...