Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:i'm not paying $250 to buy books (Score 3, Informative) 542

Just for the sake of argument (though I agree with many of your points), I'll offer up some counter-points:

- Services - A book can't deliver the newspaper to you, without any need for intervention, or killing trees.

- Search - e-books make it really easy to find that quote you're looking for.

- Dictionary - A good e-reader lets you instantly lookup a word that you don't fully understand, in my opinion enhancing overall enjoyment of the book.

- Book price - If/when bookstores start doing things as they should be done, e-books will be much cheaper than a new, retail copy of a book.

- As XKCD happily pointed out, a 3G-enabled e-reader is essentially The Guide

- Obsolescence - Most books sold for this will be in .epub, .txt, or .pdf. I'm absolutely confident that in 5 years, all of these formats will still be easily readable, and if not, there will be many free conversion tools to make them so. In fact, the more of these e-readers that get sold, and the more e-books that people buy for them, the more important this will become, and the more of a "sure thing" this will be.

Also, I'm trying to talk myself into buying one of these things. It's just so damn cool. Now, by no means will I stop buying new books, or get rid of my old ones, but I also won't feel any guilt pirating/fair use-ing e-books of books that I own or buy. Plus, there's lots of good, freely available e-books out there, even if you don't count Project Gutenberg.

Comment Re:Why not remotely? (Score 1) 39

You would either need heavy digging equipment (Which is far too large/heavy to be feasibly boosted into space with current techniques) or (literally) a ton of TNT.

Don't forget about Bruce Willis. You won't get far without him, and he's likely been putting on weight. Need to figure that into the cost.

Comment Re:Can't blame them (Score 2, Insightful) 1032

Accuracy isn't especially important in this situation. If Iran can detonate a nuke anywhere over US soil, it doesn't really matter what they hit. Hell, it's not even important how big the yield is. A direct strike on NYC, or a field somewhere in Kansas, or a swamp in Louisiana. No matter which one they hit, it would guarantee all-out war.

Submission + - FCC Backs Net Neutrality (wired.com)

ArmyofGnomes writes: "FCC chairman Julius Genachowski delivered Monday on President Obama's promise to back 'net neutrality' — but he went much further than merely seeking to expand rules that prohibit ISPs from filtering or blocking net traffic by proposing that they cover all broadband connections, including data connections for smartphones."

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...