Am I really the only one who permanently blacklists any website that has "video" news? Video requires 100% of my attention, and probably headphones, to avoid distracting all those around me. It also occurs at your speed. I can read faster than you can talk, and it does not distract anyone around me.
If i want to *SEE* what happened i'll go to youtube
On a news site I want to *READ* about it!

Same way that you could tell which direction he was coming from if invisible man bumped into you at 100mph... (seriously)

subj

If this sticks, it will be awesome, not for the security but for the statement it makes. Way to go, Brazil!

without beamforming - inverse square law says no
with beamforming, one must remember that beamforming cannot focus in just one place, smaller but still constructive maxima will exist elsewhere. what wants 1/3 of a watt focused on their gonads accidentally?

uh huh....fake...

using sound to send data....sort of like a modem?

This. It will hurt. A lot. This means that 64x64 -> 64 multiply (what gcc will do if you multiply two uint64_t values) will now need 10 multiplies, at least 20 shifts (16 to cut off tops 16 bits of intermediates, 5 for result alignment), and 9 additions, instead of just 2 long multiplies and one long multiply accumulate. Ouch...

you can...it just will be slower hardware supports only certain bit lengths.

Actually, nothing is on the Wayback Machine, except the message stating "This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamir's_Secret_Sharing

And this is why I support the right to arm bears... A couple of well-armed bears in DC will set this all straight...

7x1.5TB drive raid6 i've had two drives fail at once - raid6 saved me nicely. as backup, the data is rsynced slowly to a friend's house across the country, where it is on a 10x1TB raid6 using usb-hdds & a laptop

found this on GoDaddy years back - still the case