Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So much for Debian 8, then... (Score 2) 338

Moved on to....

I wish I could mod you up. I was curious about the same thing. So many people saying they've moved on from Debian but never ever saying which distro they moved to.

I seriously question any one who would complain about this. They really must not understand how Debian releases work. Debian Jessie is frozen, which means there is a stringent process to go through in order to add changes, we have known it was going to be frozen for months and months. Their testing releases always go through a freeze period before it moves into stable. Stable means that typically the only changes are security fixes. Expecting Debian, a distro which really doesn't like non open source software anyway, to unfreeze for something like Chrome is just an odd request. If you need bleeding edge, you should move to a bleeding edge distro, I can recommend Arch as being fantastic for bleeding edge, there are plenty of others as well. Stable/LTS releases are not ever bleeding edge. In fact, stable/LTS releases are usually significantly behind. Or even better, they can go back to Windows. Wouldn't even notice if they left.

Comment Re:Did the heliocentrism debate die? (Score 1) 284

This debate needs to happen. Even if its just to make the media companies realize how ridiculous their pricing is. I think anyone who doesn't question the movie and music industries pricing regarding digital delivery is an idiot. If pirates sites and many independent legal content sites can stream movies to people for basically free, why can't the movie industry? Yes, I realize there are costs to recoup but surely the cost of digital delivery is no where near the cost of a physical disc.

Clearly the markets are not ready to accept their pricing of 17.99 for a digital copy of a movie they can't even have the file for.

There are only a few ways this is going to go imho.

1) The content industries will continue to gouge and pretend there is a sparsity of their product and the vast majority of the internet will continue to make copies for free.
2) The content industries will be successful in killing net neutrality and gain control of the method of distribution in the same way they did television and radio.
3) They will be successful in making laws such as tfa is discussing. Piracy will still be rampant. People will needlessly be in prison.
4) The industries will realize they can't use the same business models they used pre-internet and price as if there was competition and their product is not scarce anymore.

They also need to get off of this "No one will make movies or music anymore if they wont be paid" delusion. You don't even have to stretch your brain to see how much of a fallacy that is. Garage Bands. Basement DJs. Youtube level Movie makers. Hobbyists all over. Starving artists. etc..

Comment Did the 'theft' debate die? (Score 2) 284

Did the debate about whether or not this is really theft get answered?

Is a kid watching a movie on some streaming site stealing? Is it the same as looking around and slipping a Blu-Ray in your pocket at the local store? I think we should finish that debate before we change the question to how much prison time is appropriate.

Comment The real issue is not the technology. (Score 4, Insightful) 247

The issue is not the technologies being used. The real issue is the governments that are refusing to tell us how they are using the technologies. We can not make informed decisions on what is being done in the name of the citizenry because we have no idea what they are doing.

If you want to break something, break the system of secrecy the goverments are building around you. How do we do that? I have no idea.

The common citizen doesn't have the resources -- time or money -- to accomplish real political change right now.

I would love to see the citizens have a positive debate on ways to fix things. But, as of right now, the people who seem to care the most about our current political problems are mired in some kind of bizarre left vs right blame game. As if both sides weren't actively trying to screw us. Every debate descends into who's at fault and the inevitable leap frog back through time picking examples why it was the 'other' side who started it all.

Submission + - Activists Attacked GPS Satellites with Axes

HughPickens.com writes: Ingrid Burrington writes in The Atlantic about a little-remembered incident that occurred in 1992 when activists Keith Kjoller and Peter Lumsdaine snuck into a Rockwell International facility in Seal Beach, California and in what they called an "act of conscience" used wood-splitting axes to break into two clean rooms containing nine satellites being built for the US government. Lumsdaine took his axe to one of the satellites, hitting it over 60 times. The Brigade's target was the Navigation Satellite Timing And Ranging (NAVSTAR) Program and the Global Positioning System (GPS). Both men belonged to the Lockheed Action Collective, a protest group that staged demonstrations and blockaded the entrance at the Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. test base in Santa Cruz in 1990. They said they intentionally took axes to the $50-million Navstar Global Position System satellite to bring the public's attention to what they termed the government's attempt to control the world through modern technology. "I had to slow the deployment of this system (which) makes conventional warfare much more lethal and nuclear war winnable in the eyes of some," an emotional Kjoller told the judge before receiving an 18-month sentence. "It's something that I couldn't let go by. I tried to do what was right rather than what was convenient."

Burrington recently contacted Lumsdaine to learn more about the Brigade and Lumsdaine expresses no regrets for his actions. Even if the technology has more and more civilian uses, Lumsdaine says, GPS remains “military in its origins, military in its goals, military in its development and [is still] controlled by the military.” Today, Lumsdaine views the thread connecting GPS and drones as part of a longer-term movement by military powers toward automated systems and compared today’s conditions to the opening sequence of Terminator 2, where Sarah Connor laments that the survivors of Skynet’s nuclear apocalypse “lived only to face a new nightmare: the war against the machines.” "I think in a general way people need to look for those psychological, spiritual, cultural, logistical, technological weak points and leverage points and push hard there," says Lumsdaine. "It is so easy for all of us as human beings to take a deep breath and step aside and not face how very serious the situation is, because it's very unpleasant to look at the effort and potential consequences of challenging the powers that be. But the only thing higher than the cost of resistance is the cost of not resisting."

Comment Masochistic MoFo (Score 1) 671

Wow. Is he a masochist? As others have stated above, for all of our terrible terrible problems, the US is a nice place to live. However, I don't think we've come far enough yet for him to return and receive a fair trial. His personal world here will never be the American Dream again. Too many muggles here are still drinking the 'Snowden is a Traitor' kool-aid.

His life in partial hiding is going to be better than the life in prison that our 'justice' system is sure to give him. In fact, I think he can make more of a difference as a figure head, speaking about the justice and liberties the US used to be known for. Show how a single individual can help improve upon the fucked up situation we're currently facing in the US.

I'm grateful for everything he has done, it took a real commitment and belief in justice to sacrifice his life in the US. I just really hope he doesn't end up spending his life in prison. A terrible fate for someone who is willing to give up so much to do what is right.

Comment Re:Screw the commoners. Share amongst ourselves. (Score 1) 30

As I'm sure you're well aware, we have/had many open lists where vulnerabilities are/were shared openly, so I don't really need to personally create one. This is not about anyone feeling entitled. This is about the fact that these systems are more important than just their servers. A lot of the software and hardware used to power their systems are also powering banks, many governmental systems, hospital networks, and on and on and on. To take the approach that we'll patch a few and leave the rest open is terribly bad for everyone. If you can't see that, you're not looking wide angled enough. But thanks for snotty reply. :)

Comment Screw the commoners. Share amongst ourselves. (Score 4, Insightful) 30

I find this path troubling. I could see this becoming a thing where only mega corporations benefit from this sharing, while leaving small companies, small projects, and the lowly common folk. These kinds of things should be discussed in the open. If someone knows of an exploit, it is irresponsible to not share this info so we can all band together and fix our fucking systems. It shouldn't only be the elite few in the circles of trust who get to fix their systems first.

Comment Re: I would rather see 1000 terrorists go free... (Score 1) 562

Yes. Do not allow our liberties to go away out of fear of what the worst case scenario could be. Statistics show the odds of dying from terrorism are extremely low. And there are plenty of other tools in their anti terror arsenal. They need to stop treating their own citizens as enemies and actually do targeted investigations.

Comment Re:Rules and freedoms (Score 1) 302

First things first, though: when they talk about new rules and regulations, it is not because they imagine that everybody will suddenly be law-abiding, it is because it is not possible to prosecute people for breaking non-existent laws.

I'm pretty sure it is already illegal to 'pirate' movies in most western countries. One of the many problems I think a lot of people are struggling with here is, his proposed solution has too many negative side effects. It has too broad of a negative impact on law abiding individuals and very little real world positive outcomes. For example, most technically minded people can see that a criminal would just setup a website on a server in a country that has more to worry about than whether or not someone paid to watch the new Transformers movie. So, what is the next new law we'll need to pass after a website license?

We can pass these nickle and dime laws for the next hundred years and 'criminals' are still going to find a way around them. Often, the end result from passing laws to inconvenience a criminal doesn't do much other than inconvenience law abiding people, waste time, and waste money.

It does however make for a good headline and make it at least appear like they're attempting to make a real difference, even though it has no long term measurable positive effect.

Comment Oh noes! It works for iPhone and toasters too! (Score 1) 336

Do some googling for "can't download apps for iPhone" or similar wording, and you'll see that this is a widespread chronic issue...

Do some googling for "can't download software to computer" or similar wording, and you'll see that this is a widespread chronic issue...

Do some googling for "can't stop vcr clock from blinking 12:00" or similar wording and you'll see that this is a widespread chronic issue...

Do some googling for "toast stuck in toaster" or similar wording and you'll see that this is a widespread chronic issue...

This post has got to be flamebait right?
Image

TSA Worker Jailed In Body Scan Rage Incident 352

A TSA worker in Miami was arrested for aggravated battery after he attacked a co-worker for making fun of the size of his genitals. Rolando Negrin walked through one of the new body scanners during a recent training session and a supervisor started making fun of his manhood. From the article: "According to the police report, Negrin confronted one of his co-workers in an employee parking lot, where he hit him with a police baton on the arm and back."
United States

State Senator Caught Looking At Porn On Senate Floor 574

Everyone knows how boring a debate on a controversial abortion bill can get on the Senate floor. So it's no wonder that Florida State Sen. Mike Bennett took the time to look at a little porn and a video of a dog running out of the water and shaking itself off. From the article: "Ironically, as Bennett is viewing the material, you can hear a Senator Dan Gelber's voice in the background debating a controversial abortion bill. 'I'm against this bill,' said Gelber, 'because it disrespects too many women in the state of Florida.' Bennett defended his actions, telling Sunshine State News it was an email sent to him by a woman 'who happens to be a former court administrator.'"

Slashdot Top Deals

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...