"Followed by The Black Swan"
Which was in 2007, and his day job was an economist in the finance industry while he was writing those.

Edge cases were considered in science long before an economist picked a new name for a gross oversimplification of old ideas. He's very much an anti-statistician and calls them "pseudoscientists".

What is the motivation of your little luddite sig? To say that the views of any expert are worthless and thus climate science if worthless - or is it something less obvious that makes you want to challenge the authority of anyone with a clue?

Fair enough, but this current situation looks analogous to the Mafia calling in the cops because an accountant was taking a bit on the side.

Way to get waaaay off the point, and you missed the "Art class? Maybe" above.
Deliberate pretence of stupidity is not cute you know.
The issue at hand is boys in a class giving a girl a hard time because the teacher fucked up, not ten tons of irrelevant baggage you want to pretend I'm against.

I'm in Australia so maybe they've decided we're not terrified of nipples in this part of the world.

You may be getting it because of personalized search

No. Cookies are off. It doesn't know me from anyone.

and runs the whole stereotype of men as misogynistic pigs.

The boys in that class probably were (think back to your schooldays) so the search for something that was sourced from a centrefold is a fuckup on several levels.

I think perhaps the goal is to change STEM into another version of the veterinarian field

Did a shock-jock eat your brain? No? Then lay off with the ridiculous over-reaction that insults the intelligence of everyone that reads it. You cannot possible be so stupid as to connect a complaint about porn in the classroom with a vast social conspiracy - shock-jocks had to destroy their brains with years of cocaine abuse to get that far.

True enough By pointing out how a picture of a woman that is rated G

A centrefold with nipples on show rated G in the land of the massive outrage of a nipple at the Superbowl? Not a chance of it being rated G. Mild or not, it's still porn in the CS class and the boys went into Bevis and Butthead mode which upset the girls. It was a fuckup. It's as stupid as rolling out the porn at Sunday school.

The summary above is a complaint FFS and some of the comments here contain complaints. There's no need to bring imaginary factors in, lets just keep things real OK?

The shitbag in the article committed a crime. He should be punished.

At an adult prison? The experts seem to think locking kids up in adult prisons is a very stupid idea, hence my focus on your stupid luddite sig pretending that experts are not experts which seems to indicate that very stupid ideas have found fertile soil.

Because it's a thing from 2007 from an economist FFS - so most scientists haven't even heard of it yet so of course such fringe stuff from left field gets ignored.

Doesn't seem in any way related to your post so maybe you should actually try writing some stuff instead of assuming that people will figure out the unrelated unwritten stuff for themselves. I suspect that's why the mods didn't have the faintest clue what you were writing about and just saw an accusation of a lie that hasn't happened.

The attitude sort of makes sense coupled with the weird sig - not being able to tell the difference between science and economics so not being able to make sense of juvenile versus adult criminal treatment goes with the territory.
Yes it's a personal attack but you wanted big boy games with consequences didn't you?

What's with the pathetic stalking?

I suggest you get off the computer before daddy comes back and sees you have logged into his account.

Very strong words - why exactly? Would you like high school CS teachers to discuss porn with their students or do you have some other motivation for your sad attempt at bullying me?
It's not the time, place or the person that should be trusted with doing it. By sheer co-incidence I'm currently reading a biography of a radio "shock-jock" who was driven out of high school teaching for having frank discussions about sex with his high school students until 3am (and other stuff that was suspected but not proven). It's not something that should be encouraged since teachers have so much influence over their students.

Yes to all that, but a high school CS class is not the time and place for the full image or the info that it was from Playboy, which is really the issue at hand.
Art class? Maybe. They'd probably use something out of copyright though.