I'm afraid you're going to have to retire the "HATE THIS" meme.
From now on, you have to write the hooks to ad-laden drivel using the following as a guide:
<SUBJECT> <ACTION> <ACTION>. <NEXT ACTION> <MY DISPROPORTIONATE RESPONSE>
eg.
"He Downloaded Adblock And Installed. When He Reloaded The Page, I Was Amazed."
Ensure That You Capitalise Every Word For Maximum Impact.
"method for adding two numbers using instructions and registers commonly available on x64 processors"
Tried Mosh instead of ssh? Supposed to be better over dodgy links.
If you buy a blender and it doesn't turn on, you'll take it back to the shop where they'll say things like, "You plugged it in? Locked the jug on top of the base correctly? Pressed this button here?"
"It doesn't print" is a bug report, but it's a report that implies a two-way conversation is going to take place. Perhaps Microsoft should have said in the app, "Hey, put as much info as you can in as to what you were doing at the time, because we can't get back to you once you hit submit."
I am not a participant in ANY social media at this point
You don't define slashdot as 'social media'?
But I know you live in the US. You're somewhere in your late 40's. And like to ride bikes. And train on said bikes a lot because you're on a road race team. And that's just the first page of your slashdot comments that I idly flicked through.
I suppose you could tell me that's all part of the plan and that you're actually a dog........
look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The first factor is regarding whether the use in question helps fulfill the intention of copyright law to stimulate creativity for the enrichment of the general public, or whether it aims to only "supersede the objects" of the original for reasons of personal profit. To justify the use as fair, one must demonstrate how it either advances knowledge or the progress of the arts through the addition of something new. A key consideration is the extent to which the use is interpreted as transformative, as opposed to merely derivative.
This isn't passing itself off as the very sought-after Power Rangers short movie everyone's dying to buy; this is a new work that takes the premise of an old work and does something new, with criticism about the whole "child soldier" angle.
Totally fair use.
With regards to Voyager, you can view it as Janeway's slow descent into desperation. Starts out all do-goody then as time goes by, deals are made, morals are readjusted and by the end it's just, "The hell with this".
Sweet Jesus, at least install Fail2Ban and block an IP for 24 hours after 3 failed attempts.
'Fidelity' in the wireless sense was because the methods and algorithms developed by the CSIRO had a considerable impact on the recovery of the transmitted signal.
Nah, Excel encryption/passwording is shit and is for casual users only.
I have a VBA macro that brute forces Excel passwords in a minute or two. Well, it finds an equivalent password that matches the original using the weak hashing function that Excel employs.
Wikipedia has a pretty good summary of the reasons for left and right side traffic.
Small thrusters fire to push it forwards and the fuel / oxygen in each tank gets pushed back to the pickup point.
Try VivoTek as well, they make some nice 5MP units with good optical zoom - meaning you can mount the camera a good distance away and zoom into the menu board.
We used to run mobotix exclusively, and their cameras are now in the low to mid-range in performance, but still high-end in price.
But you can get a long way with a stolen card and PayWave before someone notices, what with it's $100 limit per transaction and (usually) lengthy delays before said transactions appear on statements.
Firstly, it was considerably easier to do it on the moon. Low orbital speed, 1/6 the gravity, no air resistance on descent, very light lander (as it wasn't pushing 40+tons of second stage to orbit).
Secondly, this stage was doing Mach 8 to 10 at about 80km altitude when it separated from the second stage. They did an extra burn that briefly popped it out of the atmosphere, reversed its course, then did a hypersonic re-entry tail first and (nearly) landed on a 50x60m barge.
Nobody has done that before. Not the guys with the shuttle SRB's, they just fell back to earth (and were strong enough to withstand the tumbling in the atmosphere, being SRBs). Not Boeing with it's dinky little hops of 10,000 feet in a continuously-stable attitude at subsonic speeds. Nobody has gotten this far before with the return of the first stage of a liquid-fuelled booster. Seeing as those things are enormously complex and very expensive, it'd be great to get one back in one piece to use again.
Happiness is twin floppies.
