Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Sad... (Score 1) 242

Compared to??? The person who threw it away either didn't know Sears would replace it, or was simply too lazy to take it back. Doesn't matter how it broke, who owns it, or who returns it; when it's presented to them, it gets replaced. We're paying for quality that doesn't break in the first place, and when you do manage to break it (arc the tip off a screwdriver, snap off a ratchet using a 6ft pipe...) they replace it, no questions asked.

Comment Re:shame (Score 1) 242

I want my cables to work, thanks.

It's simply too easy these days to go on the internet and find a dozen sources that sell boxes of various cables for peanuts. The appeal of RS was being able to get odd electronic parts immediately. These days, they barely have anything -- and 95% of it is available everywhere.

Comment Re:Many mitigating factors, not THAT dangerous (Score 1) 211

... until their metasploit code is published and everyone can see how to use this error. All it takes is one example; ONE person figures out how to trigger shellcode, and it's game over. No matter how complex the situation, an exploit is an exploit. It doesn't matter if it takes 87 steps to set off a nuke, if you know those steps and complete them - *boom*.

Comment Re:Accidental bugs? (Score 1) 211

Either you write very little code, very simple code, or no one is closely inspecting your code. People make mistakes - period.

This glibc error was a simple mistake... count 3 things, put 4 in there. But yes, if their code weren't in such a f'ing complicated mess (have these fools never head of stuct) this mistake would be harder to make.

Slashdot Top Deals

With your bare hands?!?

Working...