Because this is an article about just one case? For the full list for all European cartel cases since 2001, see here:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/cases/cases.html

This already works on Windows 7, at least with monitors with the same resolution. You need to have a picture that has exactly the resolution of your monitors combined, and then select "Tile" as the option for the background. I have a part of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field as background picture, with a resolution of 2100x1680, and it spans nicely across my two 1050x1680 screens (they are vertical).

Debian potato and woody -> SuSE 8.1-9.2 -> Mandrake 10.1-2006.0 -> Kubuntu 5.10-8.10 -> Ubuntu 8.10-12.04

Guess what, they did: ::FFFF:111.222.111.222 is IPv6 for 111.222.111.222. But you still need to "fool around" with equipment because there is no way that an IPv4-only device can address an IPv6 device.

Bullshit. I have followed IPv4 exhaustion in detail for the last 5 years. The prediction was always that IPv4 will run out at the global level between 2010 and 2013 (it happened in February 2011), and run out at the regional level in the years after that (it happened in April 2011 in Asia-Pacific and today in Europe-Middle East). So no surprises at all. If you are a European ISP, and you stuck to the rules of RIPE NCC, you now have IPv4 stocks that should satisfy your growth needs for the next three months. After that, you cannot grow your network anymore without resorting to the mess that CGN is.

Not sure. Carrier Grade NAT is quite expensive as well, and a big mess to administer. It is much worth than NAT at your home router as plug and play can be used by programmes to open ports dynamically. So once you go CGN, expect many support calls because of broken stuff.

I expect most ISPs to hand out native IPv6, and - once out of IPv4 - offer CGN as a stopgap for users to reach IPv4-only servers. The biggest and most popular sites are IPv6 enabled already, and I would expect the others to follow suit as well.

I hope that this will serve as another incentive to move to IPv6. Allocations by RIPE NCC have already been very conservative over the last year (only allowing you to apply for new IPv4 space for three months of growth), so by the end of the year, there will be a real squeeze at the final customer level. I am lucky in that my ISP provides both IPv4 and native IPv6, so I will not be affected, but very few people are in such a position.

I hope that this will serve as another incentive to move to IPv6. Allocations by RIPE NCC have already been very conservative over the last year (only allowing you to apply for new IPv4 space for three months of growth), so by the end of the year, there will be a real squeeze at the final customer level. I am lucky in that my ISP provides both IPv4 and native IPv6, so I will not be affected, but very few people are in such a position.

That was a guy from the NFTA that said that, not TSA.

Our company switched from BB a month ago, we could choose between Galaxy Nexus and iPhone 4S (I had a BB Bold 9000 before). I took the Nexus and am very happy, and the only thing I hated at first was the touchscreen keyboard.

After a short search on the web, I came across the Swype keyboard (also on-screen), which allows you to type a lot faster as you keep your finger on the screen when moving from letter to letter. I think I now type even more quickly than on my BB. The only thing that is difficult is to type while walking, which was easier on the BB.

I am quite happy now that I chose the Nexus as Swype is not available on the iPhone. Some of my colleagues are quite annoyed that they picked the iPhone after I showed them Swype!

You are probably correct. I have not used the extension much but had it installed for a while. Interesting that Google would allow a developer called youtube.com!

I don't think Google objects to MP3 rips of the soundtracks of their videos - after all, YouTube offers an official Chrome extension that does the same:

YouTube Downloader: MP3 / HD Video Download (Note that the developer of the extension is youtube.com)

I think they have a problem because the external service drives people away from the YouTube website. In any case, I can't see why Google would not have the right to simply stop serving Videos to the IP addresses of the servers of the download service. So in some sense, they were nice to send a letter asking him to stop.

http://www.commodoreusa.net/CUSA_OS_Vision_Download.aspx

Rot13 is great, but to be safe, I always apply it twice.