Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Tory party is a collection of special interests (Score 1) 165

Here in Scotland we have Holyrood, who defer to Westminster for certain issues, who defer to the EU on top of that.

I'm not from Scotland or even UK, but if I were a Scot I'd vote for independence on the grounds of getting that intermediate Westminster layer out of the game; the presence of that only makes the UK government (the Tories for now...) present the de facto English opinion in Council of Ministers and in European Council as the opinion of the whole UK. If you'd become independence you'd get your own government to represent you in those institutions. Also, smaller countries get proportionally more MEP seats, so you'd also gain something in that.

And since this would all happen inside the EU, your access to UK markets next door wouldn't really be hindered at all. And you could still stay in the Common Travel Area as the Irish do, so the border wouldn't disturb you in practice. Heck, you could probably even make a deal to have a monetary union with the stub UK, if you'd prefer to stick with the Pound over the Euro. (I understand that right now the prospect of Eurozone membership doesn't sound all that great, although I personally think that the rumours of the future breakup of the Eurozone are greatly exaggerated.)

Comment Re:Encryption (Score 1) 196

I'll encrypt my sticks as soon as somebody makes an encryption software that works seamlessly in Windows AND Mac OS X AND Linux, and is easy to install and use. Currently, the only one that comes even close is Truecrypt, but due to its stupid vanity licence it isn't a real option on Linux, as it is not included in repos and as such isn't easy to install.

LUKS can work on Windows (with FreeOTFE) but not on OS X, so that isn't an option, either.

Comment WTF? (Score 3, Insightful) 1219

WTF? Driving is a privilege, not a right, not even in the US. You'll need a licence for it, and in addition you'll choose to accept certain rules and regulations by choosing to drive.

In any sensible jurisdiction, if you choose to drive, you'll accept you could be stopped and breathtested at any time and if you refuse, you'll be, and you should be, automatically subject to a blood test.

If you don't like the breathalysing, then don't drive. As simply as that. This has nothing to do with being a police state.

Comment Re:In 5 years of living in Paris (Score 1) 509

While it's true there's a creep of luxury 'smaller' 4WD (Porche Cayenne etc) - being new, they're generally more efficent than the 2-stroke mopeds buzzing around, for example.

Efficient my arse: http://www.porsche.com/international/models/cayenne/cayenne/featuresandspecs/

An efficient petrol-run 4WD car can run with less than 8 l/100 km. If it's diesel, it can run with 5 l/100 km.

If it's just 2WD, then cut off additional 1.5-2 liters per 100 km.

Comment And F-Secure installs trojans now (Score 1) 293

Funny thing here is that F-Secure's Client Security does the same; it automatically installs an extension to Firefox that adds a toolbar reporting whether a particular site is safe.

OK, you can avoid that by choosing custom install and not installing the “browsing protection”, and even if installed you can turn it off from their GUI, but the installer does not explicitly tell you that it will install a Firefox extension.

(And yeah, others too. At least Skype and Nokia PC both do this.)

Comment Another score for my N900... (Score 2, Informative) 140

...in addition to APT, general hackability and real qwerty for fast typing.

It has resistive touchscreen and thus works well in -10 C, or so, when the gloves are not particularly thick.

Not that well in -25 C though, as using thick mittens tends to make touch somewhat imprecise. ;) But at least I can use thinner gloves underneath them so that I won't have to take them completely off.

Comment Re:Blended or Single Malt? (Score 1) 172

As a sidenote, Scottish whisky production, at least single malt, is actually nowadays somewhat dependent of bourbon production. This is because maturing bourbon requires new casks and single malts require used casks.

I took a tour of Talisker distillery in July, and our guide explained us that as sherry is no longer as popular product as it used to be, they nowadays use mostly bourbon casks to mature their whisky, and the regular stuff that has been matured ten years is entirely matured in bourbon casks. (Their double matured variety gets a second round in sherry casks.)

Personally I prefer stuff that's matured entirely in sherry casks; it usually has smoother and sweeter finish. Something like this Bowmore. Not that “normal” bourbon cask matured malts are bad, either.

Comment Re:Sounds like sour grapes to me! (Score 1) 503

I'm Finn, and I think that GP wasn't all that insightful, but you're neither.

We fought well in Winter War, because the nation was very well united. It was, because Stalin's purges of the late 30s had largely targeted Finno-Ugric people in the area just behind our eastern border, and were a rather well known fact among us, even among the political left. That's why everybody knew that it was pretty much a fight about our nation's very existence, and the alternative for that existence would have been a nightmare. Stalin's establishment of Terijoki puppet government and his other known-to-be-rubbish propaganda also stressed that fact. Everybody also knew that Stalin had started a war of aggression (see Shelling_of_Mainila; Yeltsin agreed with that interpretation at 1994).

Soviet army was also very poorly led (again, due to Stalin's purges), had poor winter equipment (and that winter was harsh!), and had been led to believe that Finns would welcome them as liberators. In reality, Finns had enjoyed economic upswing during late 30s, its democracy had gradually became more stable, and the unwelcome war only messed up everything, so the war nothing but fed hatred toward Russians and united the nation.

If Stalin had shown friendly or at least neutral policy towards Finland in first place, neither Winter nor Continuation War had never happened, and we'd been able to concentrate in blocking any German invasion attempts (remeber that Sweden did just that; see military spending). But after Winter War, Finns wanted justice; they wanted back their beloved territory that had been illegally robbed off them (some among us still want it back, even though most of us now understand that it wouldn't make sense anymore). And in that situation, Germany was seen as a lesser evil. We were simply too small to cope alone any longer.

The East Carelian conquest and occupation policy pursued during Continuation War by the wartime goverment generally wasn't supported by the political left, and despite of it and the co-operation with Germans Finns still weren't sympathisers of Nazi policies. Remember that we also had some Jewish soldiers and there were field synagogues for them, all under the very nose of the Germans. (Despite of this, Finland did extradite eight Jewish refugees to Germans at 1942 under murky conditions; they ended up in Auschwitz, and this has later been seen nationally as a very shameful event.)

Former Finland's UN ambassador, who is Jewish, and who fought in Finnish army during the war, once said that he didn't even think about the German danger until 1944, when Finland actively started to seek a way out of the war; only then he started to fear the consequences of Finland's possible separate peace with the Soviets (without German approval), and started to be afraid, whether Germany would attempt to occupy as a result. Before that he only cared about the Soviet danger.

Read English Wikipedia's articles about Winter War and Continuation War. They're very informative, and fairly well balanced, at least comparing to many other sources that often take too single-sided (either Finnish or Russian) viewpoint.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...