The difference between the GPL and pretty much all EULAs and ToSes is: the former grants extra rights while the latter takes away rights. If everything else were exactly the same, except the license did not exist, your use of MySpace would be freer, but your use of GPL code would be... nonexistent. It's someone else's copyrighted material, which is simply illegal to insert into your own work without permission. The only reason that people may redistribute GPL code is the GPL itself.

I fully support anyone's right to ignore stupid EULAs and ToSes. I also support their right to ignore the GPL, and not use the code. The hypocrisy is from anyone who thinks they should be allowed the freedoms given to them by one part of the GPL without the requirements laid down by the other part.

Bad analogy. ISPs are in a position of power over its users. Generally there are only a handful of plausible choices for broadband internet in a given location. Wikipedia is just one information-gathering web site out of thousands. If you don't like Wikipedia's conditions, you can put your stuff somewhere else, including many completely free wiki sites. Whereas you can't set up your own independent broadband connection without a huge investment of money and effort.

If you are up for doing some customizations, I would suggest using ADempiere. It is very robust and can be made to do just about anything. The nice thing about it is that when you are done, it becomes an asset for you, not an expense. (Speaking about the balance sheet.) It also can do quite a bit in scaling up to help with other business processes.

Sorry to nauseate you over it. :-P It seemed like the best way to appease the AC so I figured I'd do it. I hope I didn't make you lose a meal. :-P Thanks for reading.

I forgot to address your main concern. I did want to help people feel better. No sense in making people upset.

No, I wasn't trying to be sarcastic, I was simply interested in hearing what people think without having to copy and paste my entire blog entry. Since that seems to be what people want, I'll post it here and waste more precious bits. (The last part was sarcasm, by the way. :-P ) I apologize that some of the characters and such don't appear to have translated properly.

I was thinking the other day, why is market share so important? I read various articles saying Linux has X market share, Mac has Y market share, and Windows has Z market share. I would like to throw the following question out to the masses. Who cares? The pie is large enough in this industry that it doesnâ(TM)t really matter. Especially when you look at this on a global scale. If I was producing something in an industry this size, I would be thrilled to have 0.01 percent market share. I understand that market share is extremely useful in determining growth of any product, but in this case I seriously donâ(TM)t think it matters all that much beyond a growth measurement. Right now it is very difficult to quantify which operating systems are being used the most. We canâ(TM)t count sales (there are many free operating systems.) We canâ(TM)t count downloads (one person could download it multiple times.) We canâ(TM)t even count website visits (my blog is visited more under Ubuntu Linux than any other operating system.)

So could someone tell me why it is so important to try to expend all of this energy on market share calculations? Isnâ(TM)t market share simply supposed to tell us if there is an increase or a decline in a particular productâ(TM)s use? Relative accuracy is important while complete accuracy is not. If you measure using the same tool each time and see a growth, then you can be confident that a growth has occurred. Expending all of this energy on trying to calculate the exact number of Linux users isnâ(TM)t going to really benefit everyone. Letâ(TM)s try to focus on actually making good products and having them speak for themselves.

Now before everyone starts to call me a zealot and a person thatâ(TM)s just upset that linux has a small market share, let me say one more thing. Everything has started with a small market share, and it hasnâ(TM)t mattered before. Any new product starts small. Any new service starts small. Thatâ(TM)s the point! They donâ(TM)t start out saying âoeWe have 0% market penetration so we have failed.â What they do instead is look at what overhead they can afford and build their business around that. I ran an open source business for a while, and had a very small market share, but I lived quite comfortably. Market share isnâ(TM)t the be-all, end-all, it is just one of many tools that companies can use to determine if they are growing or shrinking. It isnâ(TM)t some magical tool that tells them if they are successful.

My apologies. If you would like, I can copy and paste the blog entry. Would that help you to feel better?