Federal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
State and Local: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

That should be an even lower ranking. Especially bad when it's local TV stations that do it.

Take a look at how we treat those we consider lower than us. Even if they're human.

How is it illegal if there's a court order?

For the witty commentary and the recollections of /. old timer stories?

I remember this one time...

I don't know. In my only actual programming job in the early 90s I worked with some great MUMPS developers who happened to be female and they were at a far higher percentage of the developers I worked with than listed in the survey. I'm just pointing out that the demographics of the SO survey may not really represent what the programming community is, so what they say as what they like may not be reality.

That's true. It's been a real help in (re)learning Python.

n00b

Take a look at the demographics of the people that responded. Overwhelmingly male, average age is 29, half have been coding for less than 5 years, and almost half don't have at least a BS degree in CS.

Oh, I found it *eyeroll*

http://stackoverflow.com/resea...

The link for "most loved" at SO takes me to "compensation by technology" which merely shows pay. And doesn't even list Swift.

Releasing the source code would actually made it worse for the compatibles - in order to prevent infringement, the clones had to reverse engineer the BIOS in a clean room fashion, so no looking at the source code at all.

But I've gotten 6 or 7 MBps downloads. I'm not that concerned about uploads though I haven't had a problem with them.

Just like open source developers.

Because they're afraid they might sustain injury by cow (other) and need treatment.

Think of makers more as open source software developers - it'll scratch the itch they have. It may or may not be suitable for someone outside the community, and it would be a lot of work to make use of it. Doesn't make it bad, just different.