I will never buy any CFL bulb from you or any other company. If you want my continued business, restore your production of incandescent bulbs.

You now join LCDs on my shitlist of useless, inferior technology being forced on consumers for no goddamn reason.

I hate you all.

Love,
DoktorSeven

THIS is the Neo-Geo song.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBGHHMfk9Ew

Am I the only one that sang along to it like "Neeee-ooooo-geeeeoooo... Neeeee-ooo-geooooooo..."

As someone that is extremely left-eye dominant, 3d does not work for me. Period. I always wondered what the big deal about ViewMasters were when I was a kid, not realizing the things should be 3d (I saw them as two images of the same thing, well, one adjusted for the 3d effect everyone else was getting). If TV, movies and everything else starts following this the way everyone followed HD to screens that weren't compatible with my eyes either (any motion makes me sick, as I see horrible tearing and delays with LCD and plasma displays, even ones that are apparently the highest quality), I'm going to have to give up watching anything new.

Oh wow. Oh, fucking wow.

Not only did someone get so defensive about this as to MOD DOWN AN AC DOWN TO -1, but have flooded this discussion with replies that only show how corrupted people have gotten from Microsoft's way of doing things.

Let me tell you kids how things work in the real world, instead of Microsoft's imaginary fantasy land come to life:

Video cards are made that can do X and Y and Z. THEN -- as in AFTER THE CARDS ARE MADE -- APIs are created that give programmers the ability to access the video card's ability to do X and Y and Z.

The concept that it works the other way around -- that Microsoft creates an API that says "we want programmers to be able to do X and Y and Z" then TELLS VIDEO CARD MAKERS -- THE COMPANIES THAT CREATE THE VERY HARDWARE AND LOW-LEVEL THINGS THAT ENABLE GRAPHICS TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE -- to create cards that implement X and Y and Z -- is completely backwards and proof that we have really stopped understanding how things are supposed to function.

Here's a hint -- look up what API actually MEANS before spouting your Microsoft-centric garbage. I wouldn't be surprised if you were all Microsoft-paid trolls and marketers that are placing your twisted spin on things and making people continue to believe in your garbage. I know Microsoft hires people for this reason -- I've had people inside Microsoft admit to me that they do.

So either you're a bunch of paid trolls, or have been brainwashed by them to believe things that are completely backwards from the way things are supposed to be.

No wonder gaming these days is a horrible mess.

Now can we really make M&Ms (and tons of other foods) better by getting rid of the awful yellow dye garbage (tartrazine)? It's been shown to affect tons of people negatively and some even link it to childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder and hyperactivity.

Seriously, we can do without yellow foods or find something much safer, can't we? Why do we continue to put use this as a food dye when there are so many issues with it?

It's a real pain in the ass to analyze ingredient lists of every single thing I buy to make sure it doesn't have that in it, and it's in very non-obvious things as well (things that don't even look that yellow). Plus they don't draw attention to it like other food allergies, it's just hidden near the bottom of ingredient lists. And I'm sure I've accidentally had it at restaurants causing me to feel like crap and get headaches and feel sick afterwards.

Ban tartrazine.

If hating a company that lies, cheats, and steals its way to the top is a "disease", then I don't want to be well.

Just don't use cookies. Or at the very least, allow people to opt *in* rather than out.

What a concept, right?

All of them. Any company. Anywhere.

Greed and stupidity has absolutely taken over our society and made dealing with anyone nearly impossible.

It's the end of our society as we know it. Thanks a lot, everyone.

Exactly. XHTML is not that hard to get right, and it makes a web page "clean" in that there doesn't have to be any guessing going on in the browser to figure out what a page designer wants.

The best thing in the world would have been browsers adapting a rigid HTML standard to begin with and browsers simply saying "Sorry, this page has invalid HTML" on bad pages.

I can dream, can't I?

As someone that is allergic and/or hypersensitive to everything except Tylenol, I guess I'm screwed if I need one of those types of drugs then, huh?

Wonder how long it will take them to ban Tylenol itself.

Thanks a lot for treating me like an idiot.

These FDA morons are going to get a letter from me. Not that it'll do any good, since modern government doesn't listen to the people anymore. Not really.

How to do nothing and still think you're accomplishing something.

You have no right to complain about it opening its home page if you know how to disable it. It's beneficial because it describes any changes, like THE VERY ONE BEING COMPLAINED ABOUT IN THIS ARTICLE.

"Barely use" noscript? You "use" it every single time you go to a page, unless you're dumb enough to use it as a script blacklister instead of whitelisting as you should.

I've said it many times in the past, and I'll continue to say it: people that complain about NoScript don't understand how it works.

Yes, I'm a rabid NoScript fan and will defend this awesome piece of software to my death if need be.