Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

Submission + - Windows Head Leaves Microsoft

Hugh Pickens writes writes: "The Guardian reports that in a shocking move move that comes just two weeks after the launch of Windows 8, Steven Sinofsky, the head of the Windows division at Microsoft is to leave the company. Sinofsky had been at the company for 23 years and had been seen by some as a future chief executive of the software giant but according to reports, there had been growing executive friction between Sinofsky and other top executives at the company. "This is shocking news. This is very surprising," says Brendan Barnicle, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities. "Like a lot of people, I thought Sinofsky was in line to potentially be Ballmer's successor." Sinofsky's place will be taken by Julie Larson-Green, another Windows executive who has been at Microsoft nearly as long as Sinofsky – joining in 1993 – and will be in charge of hardware and software for Windows. "If this had happened before Windows 8 shipped, I would have worried about potential delays," says Al Hilwa, program director for application software at the research company IDC. "The strategy of folding PC, tablet, phone and set-top into a single platform and ecosystem is the right strategy, and likely will continue to be the strategy of record.""
Microsoft

Submission + - Windows Chief Steven Sinofsky Leaves Microsoft (computerworld.com)

CWmike writes: "Steven Sinofsky, the executive in charge of Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system and the driving force behind the new OS, is leaving the company effective immediately, Microsoft announced late Monday. Sinofsky was also the public face for Windows 8 and its new Metro interface, posting constant updates in a Windows 8 blog that charted its development. His last post, fittingly, was entitled 'Updating Windows 8 for General Availability.' The OS was officially launched at the end of last month. According to the All Things D blog, there was growing tension between Sinofsky and other members of the Microsoft executive team, who didn't see him as enough of a team player. But Microsoft's official position is that the decision was a mutual one. Sinofsky had only good things to say about his former employer."
Microsoft

Submission + - Sinofsky leaves Microsoft, Julie Larson-Green now in charge of Windows Division (winbeta.org)

BogenDorpher writes: Steven Sinofsky, the man who was behind the development and marketing of Windows (including the recently released Windows 8), Internet Explorer, Outlook.com, and SkyDrive had apparently left the company. In his place, Julie Larson-Green will run the Windows division while Tami Reller will take charge of the business of Windows.
Apache

Submission + - Apache Patch to Override IE 10's Do Not Track Setting (paritynews.com) 1

hypnosec writes: A new patch for Apache by Roy Fielding, one of the authors of the Do Not Track (DNT) standard, is set to override the DNT option if the browser reaching the server is Internet Explorer 10. Microsoft has by default enabled DNT in Internet Explorer 10 stating that it is to "better protect user privacy." This hasn’t gone down well with Ad networks, users and other browser makers. According to Mozilla, the DNT feature shouldn’t be either in an active state or an inactive state until and unless a user specifically sets it. Along the same lines is the stance adopted by Digital Advertising Alliance. The alliance has revealed that it will only honor DNT if and only if it is not switched on by default. This means advertisers will be ignoring the DNT altogether no matter how a particular browser is set up. DNT project has another member – Apache. It turns out that Microsoft’s stance is like a thorn to Apache as well. Fielding has written a patch for the web server titled "Apache does not tolerate deliberate abuse of open standards." The patch immediately sparked a debate which instigated Fielding to elaborate on his work: “The only reason DNT exists is to express a non-default option. That's all it does. [...] It does not protect anyone's privacy unless the recipients believe it was set by a real human being, with a real preference for privacy over personalization.”

Submission + - Amazon Debuts Kindle Paperwhite, Kindle Fire HD (slashdot.org)

Nerval's Lobster writes: "Amazon used a Sept. 6 event in California to debut a range of products, including a backlit Kindle e-reader with a higher-resolution screen, an updated Kindle Fire, and the new Kindle Fire HD in two screen sizes.

First, Bezos showed off a new version of the Kindle e-reader, the Kindle Paperwhite, complete with a backlit, higher-resolution screen (221 pixels-per-inch and 25 percent more contrast, according to Amazon). The device weighs 7.5 ounces and is 9.1mm thin; battery life is rated at eight weeks, and the screen brightness is adjustable.

He then showed off the updated Kindle Fire, before moving to the Kindle Fire HD, which features a choice of 7-inch or 8.9-inch screens, dual stereo speakers with Dolby Digital Plus, two antennas for better WiFi pickup, and a Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 processor (which Bezos claimed could out-perform the Tegra 3).

The Kindle Fire HD’s 7-inch version will retail for $199 and ship Sept. 14, while the 8.9-inch version will cost $299 and ship Nov. 20. An 8.9-inch, 4G LTE-enabled version with 32GB storage will be available starting Nov. 20 for $499, paired with a $49.99-a-year data plan."

Comment Re:Is that serious, or a straw man? (Score 1) 694

First off: IANAL. Having said that, my $.02:

Was everything sold in the pet store made within the state? Is the credit card processor for the store and all its operations in-state? Both of these seem highly unlikely. The locally owned pet store is still engaging in interstate commerce even though its not obvious.So the commerce clause probably applies to the local pet store. But that's irrelevant because the 14th amendment is primary for the ADA.

And the 14th amendment has two pieces that are relevant to the ADA: The first says that people need to be protected equally.(the "equal protection clause" in section 1). The second says that congress has the right to enforce this law (section 5). The ADA says that handicapped people deserve equal protection under the law in all the states and Section 5 gives Congress the right to pass laws that affect in-state public entities.

Note the last part - as I understand it, the ADA only applies to public accomidations. So if you have a members-only club which is not open to the public, you don't have to comply with the ADA - this is the same legal basis that allowed the Augusta golf club to prevent african american members until 1990 and continues to allow them to ban women. As a members-only club, they don't have to comply with the 14th amendment.

Comment Re:Is that serious, or a straw man? (Score 4, Informative) 694

Here's a hint:

(4) to invoke the sweep of congressional authority, including the power to enforce the fourteenth amendment and to regulate commerce, in order to address the major areas of discrimination faced day-to-day by people with disabilities.

The law cites the 14th amendment (equal protection) and the commerce clause.

Comment Re: Obligatory (Score 1) 426

Push the power button, it shuts down quite nicely. Or close your laptop's lid.

If you want, you can use Control-Alt-Delete, Alt-S then up and down to pick which of the 3 menu items pops up on the power button.

If you'd rather use the command line, the "shutdown" command still works just fine.

Almost the mechanisms to shut down windows over the past decade or so are still there. The only thing that's missing is the "shutdown" button on the start menu. The one that spawned all those "You have to use Start to shut down windows" jokes?

Comment Re:Do no evil indeed (Score 1) 383

Check the dreamwidth.org post I cited - mjg calls out (in the comments) that there IS a challenge that the OEM needs to include the distro's cert in the box, but that doesn't mean that Linux is locked out - the Linux distro just needs to work with the OEM to ensure that the cert for the distro is included in one of the set of certs that is included in the box:

"Re: Is there any way for the end-user to load their own keys?
Date: 2011-09-24 02:10 am (UTC)
From: mjg59
Not inherently. It's actually reasonably hard to do - inserting new keys requires that those keys themselves be signed by the private half of one of the keys in the KEK database, so you'd need to give your key to someone who *does* have an entry there (either the OEM or Microsoft), have them sign it and then pass that into the variable database"

I'm not saying that there aren't challenges, but it's NOT impossible. "Requires that the Linux distribution owner work with the OEM" is far from "locked out".

Comment Re:Do no evil indeed (Score 1) 383

Where did they say that? What I read in all the excerpts was that the competing OS needed to built according to the rules that Intel defined when they defined UEFI secure boot.

That's not "impossible" - According to this, it should be possible. And this says it should take about a week's worth of work for any distro to support it.

That's FAR from "impossible".

Slashdot Top Deals

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...