Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Apple Music - too expensive (Score 1) 415

im not sure that a 30 second ad every few hours is worth 15 bucks a month. for me its not, for most people i know its not.

  are we really that short on attention spans than we cant handle a 30 second ad...if it means saving $$180 a year?

It's $10 per month, so unless there are 18 months in a year where you are, it's not quite $180, but to answer the question - yes, there are a lot of people who will pay to remove the adverts.

There will still be a free tier on Apple music - the radio station thing they have - but the (self directed/semi-curated) streaming service will be paid. They've clearly looked at it and decided that the free streaming market is already well supplied - Pandora and Spotify in the US, for example, and want to go after the customers who are willing to pay to be ad free.

It's not about having a "short attention span", it's about perceived value. It's clearly worth it to many since both Pandora and Spotify have paid tiers, although clearly they have a lot more free users than paid ones.

Comment Re:Does El Capitan Fix Major Problems? (Score 2) 415

The file dialog needs some love, or a setting that says "do not poll all disks" - I have an SSD as the boot drive, but I do have connected external and internal storage on spinning drives that is accessed infrequently.

It's a pain in the ass when you open a file dialog box and the system pauses to wait for all the drives to spin up. I would prefer it to only spin the drive up if I click on a folder or volume that is on that drive.

Comment Re:24/7 Live Global Radio (Score 1) 415

I know -- from Quad Core down to Dual Core. :-(

Guess the profit margins are just high enough ...

Intel didn't have any quad CPUs that would fit at the time of the update, so they were all dual core.

Assuming it gets updated again (it's been a while) then the CPU selection will be down to whatever Intel has shipping at that time.

This is the same issue that has affected the 15" MBP refresh - the CPU was not updated since there were no quad broadwell CPUs with a suitable TDP, while the 13" was updated with the dual core broadwell chips that were available earlier this year.

Comment Re:Laugh (Score 1) 86

Perhaps, it is odd though, I don't stream or even go looking for streaming yet I hear and read about Spotifiy constantly.

That's the point.

It's like Pizza Express, whose first advert was "word of mouth since 1936" or something.

Spotify haven't used traditional advertising because it's expensive and they are already getting a lot of exposure as it is.

Comment Re:Walled Garden (Score -1, Troll) 86

It's not just about facts. It's about spirit and essence. Nobody fucks the customer as hard as Apple. No one. It was Steve Job's vision to create a company that was highly desirable and expensive on the outside, yet overrated and mediocre on the inside, all ruled with an iron fist. After all, this is a company that LOVES creating proprietary connectors and purposely making their devices incomparable with non-Apple products. It's been that way since the first Apple computer.

Cool story bro.

Comment Re:why would i want single-vendor music streaming? (Score 0) 86

OK this is admittedly a guess but it seems likely from their track record that this service will only work with Apple devices.

Why in the hell would anyone want a single-vendor music steaming service? Music isn't specific to Apple (or Sony or Google). I can outright BUY unencumbered mp3 files for so dirt cheap that streaming doesn't make any sense. Why stream when I can just buy them and copy them to whatever device I want, whenever I want, and use them long after the streaming service goes bust?

It makes no sense.

Sure you can buy music for dirt cheap - you'll still be able to after this launches.

It's almost as if different people have different needs when it comes to products and services. I'm sure there's some sense in there somewhere. Could it be that people are different from each other? Help me out here. This isn't making sense.

Comment Re:Walled Garden (Score 1, Insightful) 86

So, seeing as they are becoming competitors, when will Spotify disappear from the Apple App Store?

Has Apple ever removed a major competitor's app from the store? After it was approved?

No, but facts are a very pesky issue for Apple bashing so they're frequently ignored in favour of baseless speculation and fabrication.

Comment Re:Laugh (Score 1) 86

Spotify has never really advertised because it's never been profitable.

So you should only advertise when you're profitable?
If Doug Morris thinks this is a good thing that means it isn't a good thing for the end users.

The summary is oddly worked but it means that it has not been a net benefit financially to advertise. They would spend more in advertising costs than they would gain in income.

Comment Re:Walled Garden (Score 0) 86

Nothing requires Apple to carry everything in their store. They can deny any app for whatever reason they want.

This is definitely not true, even if you only count the US. When you are in a position of market dominance you have to obey antitrust laws. If US law applies to this case or not is somewhat debatable as Apple has less than half the smartphone market, but I don't think it would be legal in Europe for example.

So what market are they dominant in? The sale of Apple-branded products?

Or are we forgetting that Apple is only a "dominant monopolist" when it suits slashdot, and the "failing has been" when talk abut how Android has so much market share?

It can't be both.

Comment Re:Pandora (Score 1) 86

This is not going after Pandora users, it's going after people who don't currently have a streaming service.

If it launches in the UK then it also might be for me since we can't get Pandora and while I like Spotify well enough, it didn't seem to work as well as Pandora did when I tried in in the US.

Either way, more competition in the streaming space will be good, surely.

Comment Re:Will anyone exploit it? (Score 4, Insightful) 82

Targeting OS X is tempting because of 99% of all Mac users *knows* that "Macs can't get infected" (the Apple salespeople told them so), and therefore they don't have any kind of antivirus installed.

At work, I daily deal with Mac-users who gets their mailaccounts hijacked because of infections. It takes roughly 10-20 minutes to convince them to download and run Avast or something like that, but it's worth the "oh....".

Out if interest, what "infections"? Do you have any examples. That's clearly a big issue if you're dealing with it daily. What infections are we talking about here?

Not that I'm doubting your story or anything.

(NECESSARY DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT CLAIMING THAT OS X CANNOT GET INFECTIONS)

Slashdot Top Deals

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...