"To put it in your own retarded words:"

Not sure what the paraphrase is achieving there. I guess thats between you what passes for your braincell.

"I'm pretty sure that's not true"

Ok , no one with a clue expects.

"Are you done now making yourself look like an idiot?"

Sorry, I think you've been looking in the mirror by mistake. Go lie down and have a rest. Maybe the cluetrain will pull into town for you soon.

In plenty of fields (aviation, industrial, railway) there's always a backup failsafe system. No one expects any one system to be 100% fooolproof. Perhaps they - and you - could go learn something from these areas.

Wtf has power out got to do with it? That was a seperate issue question. FFS, can you read english?

To be fair, no one apart from a few vested interests are claiming that quantum computers are some sort of magical panacea. But just like modern graphics GPUs, they could be built into ordinary computers and used when the problem domain suits their capabilities.

Who said anything about a key? You ever seen a proper combination banking safe? Anyway, I meant have the mechanical locking as a secondary backup, not as a failsafe opening mechanism for the electronic lock.

No, I meant as a secondary seperate lock you idiot.

Thanks, but I did read the article first. However obviously you must have understood it much better than I, so if you could point me to the part that describes why a mechanical backup lock would be impossible to install in the safe I'd be much ablidged.

Surely if this is supposed to be a highly secure box it would be a good idea to have an old fashioned mechanical lock alongside the electronic stuff so if one system fails the other is still in operation? Also what happens in a power cut?

A flintlock that has a good chance of exploding in your face when you fire it because Ball 1.1 is slightly too big for Barrel 1.0.

Well google it then you idiot. There have been plenty of incidents, Ferraris are far from reliable.

"Jeep and RAM models where never designed here"

Not 100% correct. The new jeep renegade is a rebodied 500X.

Chrysler is not a partner of fiat, its a subsidiary and was sold to it by Merc a few years ago for a song.

... you know things are going badly.

The company has never had a good reputation wrt quality control or longevity of its vehicles. Seems like little has changed when they stick a chrysler or jeep badge on some bodge up they designed in Turin.

Disclaimer: I'm neither an american nor italian, just someone who likes properly built cars.

"While X is remote capable try running modern applications taking advantage of full modern X11 features, you'll find they dont work without workarounds like VNC or degrading their capabilities"

So what? I don't think anyone would expect perfect alpha blending on shading at 60fps over a network link. But something is better than nothing. Currently wayland is only offering the latter.

I'm sorry but you can't just come up with a new display driver and say arrogant BS like "oh, that network transparency stuff, no one uses it anymore, who cares" just because its either too difficult for them to implement or they're just not interested in doing it. Well some of us DO use it and we DO care.

... but here in the UK our Met Office sometimes can't even get it right 12 hours in advance. I'm not blaming them for that because the point i'm making is it doesn't matter how powerful the computer, if you don't have enough data and/or the software model isn't good enough then the hardware won't make much difference especially when chaos theory is working against you all the time too.