nonsense, contraception is cheap. people can buy their own damn contraception, cheaper than a movie per week.

such people become more limited in what they can do without corporation and corporate rights. and there is more that can be done to individuals to fight corruption

I was hoping Obama would reverse some of the big corporate control in this country compared to what the Republican party has been doing for decades, but instead we have president who talks the talk while walking the same mega-corporate bitch walk. Even "Obamacare" doesn't have a robust public option because it just keeps the same greedy big corporations in the healthcare loop, so no end to the cost spiral

I use FreeDOS with grub in it to multi-boot thin clients that can only boot from a FAT formatted partition. funny some HP thin clients require that, others don't. I make "servers" out of thin clients, usually with OpenBSD

of course it is a food source, this is why the most dire of predictions about certain catastrophic oil spills didn't happen (yes, they were very bad anyway). there are bacteria that eat petroleum, there are bacteria that can eat petroleum products. of course, this could still be a food chain problem if larger organisms consume the bacteria and are poisoned or otherwise sickened or malnourished.

also, maybe the amount of plastic in land fills vs. ocean is underestimated.

nonsense, not about revoking first amendment, corporations were created by law and thus can be altered or destroyed (for example, by demoting to merely type of business) by law or amendment

money being used to corrupt government is the issue, we can take away the feeding tube for evil desire by those in government, we can attract a different kind of person to be in government

you are being a shill for corporate fascism, somehow equating a corporation with a person. they are not humans, they are not born with inalienable rights and liberties. we can keep the bill of rights, and deny it to corporations

yes, talking about same guy. he can start enforcing existing law in all kinds of ways if he really wanted to do something, but Obama is all talk

wrong, a corporation can be deprived of any wealth or liberty or freedom by law, since they only have existence by mere law. they are very different from humans in that regard. They could be demoted to a kind of businesss not much different than mom and pop shop

I only give as example, one of many possible scenarios

we can certainly do anything to a corporation, strip anything from it, by law, without impact on individual liberties

nonsense, you invent a straw man "Changing the situatio requires rewriting the first amendment"

no, it doesn't.

a corporation can be stripped of any and all rights, even to exist as legal entity, just for example, and individual liberty remains.

yes, slap a solar panel charged usb port on anything and it becomes "smart" and "sustainable" and "next generation"

Coming to a park near you, the Smart and Sustainable Porta-Potty and the Smart and Sustainable Hot Dog Stand

this issue has nothing to do with who is president, nor can any president solve the problem. remember Douglas Adam's words, the purpose of a president is not to wield power but merely to distract attention from those who do.

who said anything about revoking the First Amendment? This is not an issue of freedom of religion, speech, assembly or petition.

We are talking of corruption, of money controlling our lawmakers and executive branch. We are talking of cutting out control by large corporations who have circumvented the democratic process.

reminds me of incident The Algonquin Round Table, a bunch of writers, critics, actors, comedians, etc. that met at lunch daily at Algonquin Hotel in NYC from 1919 to 1929:

(friend feeling top of playwright Marc Connelly's bald head) ""Marc, your head feels as smooth as my wife's ass."

Marc Connelly (feeling top of his own head): "why so it does, so it does"

the mega-corporations (banking cartel, big oil, defense, etc.) that have our government in their pockets won't be stopped or hindered by this well-intentioned idea. something more drastic would be needed, constitutional amendment using path of national convention and ratifying states