Just one of my many complaints about M$ is that irritating "we know better than you Where You Want to Go," attitude. Recent bitch is about how you cannot force a reboot anymore.

It used to be that when an OS was hung, and you can't control+alt+delete, you could at least power the computer off. Nowadays, the hardwire switch is connected to the operating system, so you can press the "off" button all you like, it's still hung. You have two choices, really: you can change the BIOS to accept a hard reboot after holding down the power switch for five seconds, or just unplug the damn thing from the wall.

The latter does not work with laptops (with working batteries), and in some cases, the former. I have a Win2000 laptop from work that hard freezes a lot, and I have to disconnect the power, then unhook the battery to get it to reboot. Holding down power switch for hours wouldn't reboot it.

Pain in my ass. Linux never does this to me. Up yours, Microsoft.

I thought I'd give this GUI a try, since I have been curious about it, and I had a spare machine to run it on in case I fouled it all up. Basic summary is this is very unfinished and needs work, but since it's a beta, that's to be expected, although I would more than likely call this an Alpha-type release than anything else. Usually betas have most of the features installed. I will be truthful, but not overly critical. This machine was a Red Hat 9 box with a small Intel 8mb VGA chip.

I downloaded the full version (with libs), unpacked it, and followed the INSTALL instructions to a T. I made no assumptions. The install directions are very basic, and easy to follow, so no problems there.

I logged on as a normal user, and chose xpde as my GUI off of GDM. The first time, I got an error (MS-like) in blocky-jaggy fonts that stated it could not find /opt/themes/something...something.png. I clicked "OK" and got 1/3rd of the center of my screen with nothing but my default Redhat blue background and a taskbar. I couldn't click anything on the menu but "logout," so I did.

I tried again, expecting the same. But I got a different response! This time, I got the same error, but the desktop background was the picture of a meadow. The taskbar was still in the center of the screen, but now I could click on other stuff. I clicked on "Control panel" and the GUI crashed, putting be right back to GDM. Hmmm...

So I tried again. This time, the title bar was properly rendered at the bottom of my 1028 x 768 screen, with the green meadows desktop background. I could click on anything with no crashing.

The feel is very WindowsXP with "classic desktop," but with an added "HOME" link on the desktop. Here's what I found while poking about.

Clicking on HOME and MY DOCUMENTS produces an Explorer-like interface. I say "like" because the icons are all generic grey boxes with a blue stripe on the top. MY COMPUTER does not show the correct hardware on the system. It has a FLOPPY drive, even though this machine does not have one. When I click on it, it shows nothing. I don't know where it goes, because I cannot right-click and do a "New" anything (it's not even a choice). I have no /mnt/floppy.... so where's it getting it? Same with CDROM. When I write a file in /mnt/cdrom, it shows up in the explorer, which does not dynamically update, I might add; you have to close it and reopen it to refresh, and even that's not a sure thing... there is no "refresh" from the dropdown menu, and F5 does not work. Only closing and re-launching explorer works.

Right clicking anything, and selecting "properties" does nothing. Half the dropdown menus in the Explorer also do nothing. Double clicking on application shortcuts do not launch items except Calculator, Notepad, Command prompt (generic Xterm), and File Explorer.

The fonts are old style KDE mini-jaggy everywhere: dropdown menus, file listings, taskbar, everywhere. Even the icons look like bad closeups. Sometimes the desktop would not refresh, and I'd get blue icon shadows until I right-clicked and hit "refresh."

Right clicking desktop brings up the desktop menu. There seems to be no "themes" to select from. I was able to change the desktop wallpaper, but only from jpegs. Everything else (Screensaver, Appearance, Display) did not work that I could see. Arranging icons did nothing, but I was able to make a working shortcut (I used xeyes) on the desktop. Then I tried Mozilla, and while the XPDE shortcut did nothing, my shortcut launched it successfully. I has able to right click, and change the properties (I changed the icon to a jaggy Mozilla-ish icon). I cannot lasso multiple icons, I can only move one at a time.

After browsing the web a little, when I clicked on a site that launched a new window, the GUI froze, and froze HARD. CNTL+ALT+DEL did nothing. CNTL+ALT+BACKSPACE got me back to GDM, and when I logged back in, all my previous settings were still there. I was unable to reproduce this, so this may have been a Mozilla thing.

The Network Neighborhood did have the ability to add some info about the network, but it wouldn't let me add a WINS server, and couldn't see anything in my Workgroup, although it listed it. When I added my username and password, it showed my username as a machine on the network. Needless to say, clicking on it did nothing.

The control panel icons launch, but not much can be changed. I was unable to change even the most basic of things, like keyboard rate, double-click speed, etc...

My summary of this is that while it has a look of WinXP, the feel has a loooooong way to go. If this were XP, I would have assumed the registry was corrupted beyond repair, and done a full reinstall. But this is a beta, and they have acknowledged at least half these issues as far as I can see. So this will be a waiting game to see if they are able to get the look AND feel of Windows... in my lifetime. I would hope this continues to develop, because this GUI has a lot of protential for easing users into Linux.

Meanwhile, I'll stick with the good old KDE and terminal windows.

I have always heard that "If you have enough monkeys banging randomly on typewriters, they will eventually type the works of William Shakespeare."

I have since heard the joke that Usenet has proven this not to be true.

This site actually is attempting to prove the original concept. Sure, it's a bit tongue-in-cheek, but cool nonetheless.

I have always thought Evangeleon was one of the longest and dullest sci-fi anime series that ever messed with my head. My friend, Mark Mandolia, phrased it thusly:

From the THEM Reduced Anime Archive:
-----------------------

Shinji
I have no spine.

Rei
I have no personality.

Asuka
I have no humility.

Misato
I have no responsibility.

Gendou
I have no morals.

Director
I have no ending.

Audience
Oh my gosh! This is the best anime we've ever seen!

THE END

This... is so damn funny.

Doom as a tool for system administration. Yeah, instead of kill-9'ing your ps list, you can shoot at them. And they shoot back! AHH! Look out, it's a csh shell!

This showed up in an OpenBSD port of the UNIX program "fortune" today...

"Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear -- kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor -- with the cry of grave national emergency... Always there has been some terrible evil to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it by furnishing the exorbitant sums demanded. Yet, in retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to have been quite real."

-- General Douglas MacArthur, 1957

Neat quote. It's as true now as it was back then. I feel another release of Miller's The Crucible coming on... Being a called a terrorist is like being called a communist under the McCarthy Era. I wonder if it's true, that MacArthur said that? On the Internet, you never can be sure; people attribute quotes incorrectly all the time. Here's another quote from someone on Slashdot:

"When a baby gets a new toy, the first thing he does is break it. Still think you're L337?"

I have always liked that one. I hate script kiddies, ever since those immature weenies made it hard to be a BBS sysop in the BBS days of the 1980s. Of course, sometimes the best way to find out how something works is to break it apart, but I don't think that's what this quote means...

Last quote was from Darkhunter of Madpenguin.org:

"I don't need all that user-friendly stuff; it never works. As long as I can get it working, it is friendly enough."

And THAT, my friends, is why I like Slackware.

I am debating on whether or not to have a journal here. At first, I thought, "Why?" but then I realized that my own journal on my web page is always trying to decide whether to cater to techy or journal people.

If I use this site, I think I'll do all tech-related notes.

Here's a taste: I just took the RHCE 300 Rapid Track course, and while I didn't pass the exam, I learned a LOT of cool stuff. One of them was a script our teacher made where you can see who has ssh access on your dhcp leases:

#!/bin/sh
# Copyright 2003 Brad Smith

for i in $(perl -ne 'm/^lease\D+?(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)/ ;
if ($1 != "") { print "$1\n";}' /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases) ;
do echo "Who's on $i?" ;
if ping -c1 -W1 $i &>/dev/null ;
then ssh $i w ;
else echo "Nobody there!";
fi ;
done

Arg... this journal format doesn't lend to cut and pasting code very well...