Comment Re: Considering how few boys graduate at ALL (Score 2) 355
garbage humans -> waste collectors
garbage humans -> waste collectors
Of citizens, of course. Every year, remove the 14.5% poorest citizens. There you have it, poverty ended!
Nah, he was... "It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who does?"
Why not make them asexual then? Gay relationships can have self-destructive crazy, too.
Gay tendency could be a side effect of other gene that is beneficial (or a combination thereof and/or along with a nurture component). For example, you wouldn't argue that blind spots are a survival trait, would you? And yet eyes without them would be considerably better.
You could say that about every genetic trait modern humans have. What about short sightedness, then? How about an allergy to peanuts? Are these survival traits, too?
It's because the poor people that do vote, senior citizens mostly, don't like living next to drug addicts that engage in petty theft, sell drugs and sometimes do much worse deeds, and live off the government dole. For whatever sins the republicans are known for, the thought is they will help prevent theiving meth heads from living next door to them.
I am just surprised, really. I'd like to know how you came to that conclusion. Although, I could see how female gamers might like it because of the limited interaction between players prevents a lot of the griefing in other games.
Yeah, but Dark Souls is also really popular with women.
Citation needed.
how many games actually want to capture real-world data?
It would work for more than real world data. You could take any CGI scene from any movie done today, turn it into voxels and use it in their engine.
2. Isn't BTC anonymous hence why bother reporting?
You better have documented some source for the money on your tax return after $100,000 USD suddenly lands in your bank account, or the government will throw you in jail.
I live in Taiwan too. I'm on the Taiwan mobile prepaid plan which is 2gb for 300 nt (around 10 us dollars). Can i ask how much you're paying?
Interesting, but I thought a lot of the way we determine the direction of sound is through triangulation, in combination with the delay it takes from sound to hit one ear and then the other. That's why when you try hard to listen for where something is coming from, you often instinctively tilt your head slightly. (and the time for sound to travel from one ear to the other is also why when you hear things underwater, you have trouble telling where they come from because sound travels faster in water than in air)
This isn't the same thing. What's being measured here is the reaction time, which isn't the same as measuring how fast an animal's appendages move.
If hardware isn't the problem, then it must be an algorithmic one. So, why can't an algorithm be discovered that is a breakthrough?
The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood