I got an idea. Let's make a post about it on
It's a dating site. If you don't come back and pay them/look at ads, they die. Of course it's broken. It's supposed to be. Look at these numbers. Much different from 1970, before dating sites came along and ruined everything. The "dating" sites are ensuring all you ever do is have bad dates. If you get luck and find a partner, you're the exception, not the rule.
From the king of ignorant fucksticks:
"If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place." -- Eric Schmidt
And yet, even G+ repealed it's real name policy.
Why would you insist on turning this into LBGT vs CIS rather than acknowledge the real name policy is just plain dumb? I sense a closet homo who feels guilty about jerking off to tranny porn
The policy adversely affects writers, artists, actors, and about eleventy brazillion other legit reasons to use a pseudonym.
Wait. Do my ears deceive me? You are denying a well known scientific observation because it doesn't fit with your AGW doctrine? You think the OCO-2 sat is a 280 million dollar conspiracy to debunk AGW? Denier! Denier!! dave420 is in a denier of teh science!!11!ONE!
You guys are idiots. You want to know why there are so many people who are skeptical about AGW? Look in the mirror. If you don't know anything about climate science, keep your opinions to yourselves please. You aren't helping your side of the argument. Here's a quick list of papers I found with google. You could find hundreds more in no time at all.
I wonder... do you actually believe your spiel or do you just keep copy/pasting it to karma whore? Last time, I pointed out that there are significant unknown sinks of CO2. Yet here you are, lobbing the same half truths at the audience. So, tell us oh wise one... if you were in charge of the planet today, what would you do to reduce atmospheric CO2, given that the real climate scientists don't even know where it is all going now? I'd love to hear your plan, glorious leader.
What happens when you shut the air conditioner off in your house?
I save the fucking planet, that's what.
People think that a study that uses statistical wizardry to show correlations between two things is 'scientific' because it uses high school math and was done by someone in a university building
"And here we see that increasing CO2 levels is causing increasing global temperatures..."
Yep, coorelation != causation.
5) Humans produce more CO2(and other green house gasses) then can be absorbed through the cycle. Testable? Yes. Tested? Yes.
Test results? Missing carbon sinks. Well known fact that you glossed over. Every time you guys do that, you lose credibility. You can't convince skeptics by lying through omission.
Stealing is wrong no matter the context.
Except when it applies to a Law Enforcement Backdoor, right? If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear... right?
All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin