Now where are all of the burnout ex-military PTSD cases going to work?
The boy is already dead, don't you get it? Sure, he's breathing, but he's almost certainly in diapers and is most likely being fed through a tube. If your idiotic religion says that preserving this kind of "life" will help you get closer to your nonexistent god through suffering, fine. This boy, however, is being tortured in the name of said idiotic religion and probably has no say in the matter. That is wrong and this doctor should have his licence pulled.
Having such a disease renders the boy ineligible for a heart transplant . . .
your name happens to be Mickey Mantle, eh?
Remember that? He got a new liver after he nearly drank himself to death. Normally a transplant committee wouldn't even open the file in such a circumstance, but money talks.
caused by the Duchenne MD? Yes. Now this poor boy will have to live another 25 years locked in a body he has no control over. I'm sorry, but that's not life, hell, that's not even existence. That sounds more like, well, Hell.
Having such a disease renders the boy ineligible for a heart transplant, meaning almost certain death without an alternative solution.
Well, duh.
Dr. Amodeo found such an alternative in the form of a 90-gram, fully-robotic heart that took 10 hours to fit inside the boy's left ventricle. It is a permanent solution offering as much as 25 years of life and is powered by a battery worn as a belt."
What could POSSIBLY go wrong, eh?
This being very Catholic Italy, I have my suspicions that this whole exercise is being undertaken out of some perverse familial desire to keep the boy alive long enough for him to sire a male offspring, a la the case of the Boy in the Bubble.
This is easily rule 11 territory as any first year law student can tell you . . .
Any first year law student can tell you that Rule 11 is a civil rule, not a criminal one.
I don't know why I waste my time . . .
Also from the court documents:
Ms. Kanae was present at the hearing on this motion and admitted that she had assisted Mr. Smallwood in the preparation of his filing . . . Although she was not prepared to represent Mr. Smallwood at the hearing and argue on his behalf, Ms. Kanae has now appeared in this action, and the Court is confident that she will sign all future pleadings that she prepares (as she properly did for Plaintiff's Second Supplemental Mem.).
He's not pro se, in other words. He's represented by counsel.
You are correct, though, that as a pro se, he would have gotten creamed. The judge initially dismissed his complaint sua sponte for failure to properly allege federal jurisdiction. No way is this guy a lawyer.
What other jobs? We're talking here about a country with near double-digit reported unemployment (the real rate is probably a lot closer to 25%) and whose largest employer is Wal-Mart. Exactly where are these guys going to find work at all, much less any that will make them prematurely jump ship?
I suppose they could be prison guards. That's about the only growth industry left in America nowadays.
What other jobs?
I suppose they could be prison guards. That's about the only growth industry left in America nowadays.
Actually, busting through the ice is hazardous to your launch mission, since you have to make a SHIT-TON of noise before you can ever open your missile hatches.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't those birds be landing over LA, NYC, and DC while you were still deciding what to do about the mysterious noise you heard in the Arctic?
Call it fanboyism, but I do not think Linux is such a terrible operating system that it would see no use whatsoever, or practically so.
Hmm, let's see here . . .
In this corner: Spend a weekend recompiling my kernel two dozen times to get some piece of hardware to work the way it's supposed to.
In this corner: Plug it in and it does what the hell I need it to do, no kernel recompiles required, thus allowing me to spend the rest of my time doing other things I enjoy.
If you think I'm trolling, no less an authority than JWZ agrees.
I agree, Linux is a great operating system, but even as far as it has come, it's still not ready to be a full-time desktop OS that could replace Windows, much less Mac.
Can someone (who knows what the hell they're talking about, and can give cites) please tell us what the actual Federal law is that controls this situation.
You're an idiot blowhard. If you ever were actually in the situation you describe, you would wet your pants followed by confessing to being bin Laden if that's what the cop suspected.
Same reading assignment I gave to another pallid
"Am I under arrest?"
"No? Then shoot me, mother f*cker, or get out of the way."
Bzzt, wrong answer. The correct answer is, "officer, am I free to go?" What you're doing is known in the trade as "flunking the attitude test." It is also known as "contempt of cop" and is likely to earn you some "street justice."
And I'm headed for the door. And ANYONE who lays a hand on me is guilty of assault, and I plan to protect myself.
By the tone of your post, I'm assuming that you intend to protect yourself with a firearm. Guess what - you've just escalated the situation from nothing to you being clad in a diaper strapped to a gurney saying your last words right before receiving a megadose of animal traquilisers in full of the parents whose basement you live in at the age of 40. All because you're a typical American jackass who thinks he's Rambo and who thinks a gun is the solution to every problem. Hope you enjoyed your last meal.
What a crock! If you are detained from going about your business, you are ARRESTED!!
Wrong. Detained != arrested.
Reading assignment: Terry v. Ohio . If you've watched Law & Order, you've probably heard of a "Terry stop." That is what this is referring to. See my previous comment re: posting to
This kind of crap really makes me embarrassed to be an American...
..If you voted for Comrade Obama, check back with me in a couple years.. I'm betting you won't like him then...
This ignorant dreck in your sig makes me glad I don't have to share a country you with anymore. Unfortunately, I have to share a very long "undefended" border. Now, if there was something I could do about that, I would. Those of us in touch with reality know that Obama is about as far as you can get from a "comrade." The truth is, the Obama administration is really Bush's third term.
I'll bet you think he's a Kenyan Muslim too.
Funny, I don't see an "except for the border" clause in the Bill of Rights.
The latest example of the legal illiteracy that pervades
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the Fourth Amendment does not apply at the border. At all. Anyone can be searched, questioned or detained at any time for any reason at the border or the "functional equivalent of the border." And in a country of laws, the U.S. Supreme Court has the right to say what the Constitution says.
Federal statutes don't trump the constitution.
All enactments of Congress are presumed constitutional. That presumption holds unless and until the courts, and ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court, say otherwise.
May I suggest an "Intro to Law" or "Law for Nonlawyers" course at your local community college?
"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android