Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 20 declined, 0 accepted (20 total, 0.00% accepted)

×
The Internet

Submission + - Canadian Police Tolerate Piracy

headkase writes: "Torrentfreak brings word that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have stated that they are not that interested in pursuing piracy in the case of personal use. Another link to offset the slashdot effect. And a link in Canada's other official language: French. Considering Canadians already pay levies on blank media to compensate publishers for piracy loss, do you believe this is a positive or negative development?"
Education

Submission + - Wider Integration of OLPC?

headkase writes: "As everyone knows, the One Laptop Per Child project is a noble effort. Once the laptops begin to enter wide circulation are there more supporting systems that could complement OLPC? Imagine financial, logistical, and knowledge mechanisms working in concert. The Internet infrastructure comes first so as an example a village needs to build a water well. So they have a wireless connection and they access a logistical site that is basically Wikipedia for how-to(s). The how-to(s) tell them how to make a well and the logistical infrastructure provides information on what required parts can be manufactured locally and what needs to be ordered (such as one metal piece as part of the well-pumping mechanism). Then financial supports could subsidize specific items only such as the one piece that couldn't be made locally in the well pump example. Now, the software to implement all this would be a great open source project to develop with the OLPC hardware as the target. Basically the question is this: should the OLPC project expand out from an initial position of just providing hardware into wider education, philanthropy, and self sustainable development missions? Please try to elaborate more on these or your own ideas."
Announcements

Submission + - Calling all Citizens!

headkase writes: "Wired is running an article on Saving Democracy with Web 2.0. They discuss organizing information that is publicly available into models that can be easily used and understood by an average person. This is all well and good but can informed citizens following self interest really be trusted to motivate politics in place of big business and special interest groups? Maybe some support can be drawn from a recent book, The Wisdom of Crowds? What do you think, how can the web fulfill the great expectations people have of it?"

Slashdot Top Deals

"I don't believe in sweeping social change being manifested by one person, unless he has an atomic weapon." -- Howard Chaykin

Working...