I was using Marx's definition of Socialism.
Marx isn't Mohammed. He doesn't define "socialism" for everyone now, if he ever did, and certainly few if any socialists I know would defer to his definition. Any Marxists still around hate socialists more than anyone else for not being pure enough.
Maybe I should have used "democratic socialism" which is what most current socialists profess.
Anyway, you haven't actually cited any sources, just invoked some names.
Not under one Constitution, which is what I referred to.
Fine. Enabling you to just completely ignore any country, like most of Europe, that didn't follow your exact historical progression and evolved their constitutions rather than creating them in a dramatic event.
Communism -- true Communism, by the very definition of what Communism is -- has no government. Name me one country in written history that qualifies.
That was the final stage, which of course was never attained. Many though did have quite idyllic "all for one and one for all" periods of altruistic government for a short time after the revolution, until the assholes started manoeuvring for power.
Anyway, I wouldn't care about your silly word games except you are using them to say every form of government except your own is shit. A sadly common insular American attitude.