Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The Gist (Score 2) 696

Many names and information in the leaks has been redacted. Have you even read the cables, or are you just parroting what you hear on the news? Leaking everything at once would also be a bad idea. It would be information overload and lots of important things would be missed. By releasing a little at a time, it should give everyone a chance to read and digest the leaked items. Unfortunately, major media outlets seem to be ignoring some of the more horrific leaks, such as Bayer's' involvement in the decline of bees, and the State department covering up for contractors that aided in child prostitution. Items like that should be front page news, but I guess they would rather focus on the Assange media circus rather than exposing corruption.

Comment Re:ergh (Score 1) 174

Their market research probably shows that people prefer a smaller screen on tablet, or that a smaller screen for less money is preferable to a larger screen for more money. Do you really think they enter in to a project of this scale without doing a little research first?

Comment yay (Score 0) 338

Kudos to Apple. They know what's best for us more than we do. Maybe the next iphone will have its internet access filtered through the great firewall of Cupertino as an added feature.

Given their constant "nannying" of their user base, it's no wonder they are based in California.

Comment regulate (Score 1) 400

This is why net neutrality is a good thing, even though I hear a lot of complaining about "increased government regulation" on a regular basis whenever net neutrality is discussed. If major carriers are colluding with each other, then they need to be regulated to ensure that the "rules" of capitalism are being followed. Regulation isn't always a bad thing, even though some people seem to think that it is.

Comment Re:scary for net neutrality (Score 1) 400

The major carriers often collude with each other instead of competing. No one said they are plotting the downfall of the working class, or that this is some sort of shadowy conspiracy. If they all decide to go the route described in the article, it means greater profits for all without the "hassle" of competing. Sure, it goes against the tenants of capitalism, but I don't think the major players really care. They do whatever will make them the most profit, and competing is not always good for profits. You seem to think that companies will uphold the tenants of capitalism even when they have to sacrifice profits to do so, and that amazes me.

Comment Re:AnonOps part of the problem, not the solution (Score 1) 295

The establishment doesn't really need a reason to pass repressive legislation. They could very easily tack it on to another bill, as they have done many times in the past. By the time anyone notices, it's too late.
That being said, DDOS attacks aren't a great way to get their point across. Last I heard, the Anonymous group decided to stop the DDOS and do what they can to post or spread information contained in the leak documents instead.

Comment Re:Ron Paul (Score 5, Interesting) 565

Freedom of speech or not, I like to know when my government is covering up things like contractors supplying underage children to rich Afghanis for prostitution.

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2010/12/wikileaks_texas_company_helped.php

Slashdot Top Deals

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...