Comment Re: where's the money?! (Score 1) 213
If it's within a factor of 10 it's close to me. Again, you can't really convince me otherwise by redefining what YOU want "close" to mean.
If it's within a factor of 10 it's close to me. Again, you can't really convince me otherwise by redefining what YOU want "close" to mean.
> No. Not even close. At that rate, we would be adding a billion people every 6.8 years.
Yeah, that sounds about right. So I'm going to disagree, hundreds of thousands is close, regardless of what numbers you want to pick from.
> Now it (worldwide population) is growing by millions a day.
http://www.ecology.com/birth-d...
400k/day. But gettin there..
> so MP3 would fail.
That's correct. So what?
MP3 was never a good compression algorithm. It's an audio format that uses a normalization that cause SOME audio to be lossy. It's a great demonstration on how a negligible loss across a wide range of audio could result in a more useful algorithm for sound (it's quite compact). MP3 is not a good compression algorithm and doesn't see a lot of use outside of commodity audio, where you can afford to throw away data.
> The summary can be both accurate and incendiary. Being flamebait does not mean it is inaccurate.
I didn't characterize it in any other way. Quit your kneejerk.
> =There is no situation in which there isn't a filed issue?
Apple doesn't seem to care (as per the summary) would be a situation. Apple certainly would take the opportunity to say "Nuh uh" as any corporate entity loves the PR blame game. Information isn't perfect, but it's not a case where it's really necessary. Maybe something will come out tomorrow. Today, nothing.
> Citation needed.
Apple didn't claim one. You're using "Citation needed" to ask for the assertion of something that doesn't exist? Until Apple makes a statement to that effect, none has been made. Citation needed for where you can find out? You can't.
> I have issues with the way Apple's App Store works. Your mind reading leaves something to be desired.
"Mind reading", yet calling the story flamebait...ironic. Flamebait implies that it was to provoke a response. Most readers don't take offense at the subtle distinction between "nothing" and "nothing yet" or even "nothing to satisfy the EC". You chose to interpret it and characterize it as flamebait, from your own imagination.
> it hasn't agreed to any specific actions or any time line. This is much to the commission's disapproval, but Apple doesn't seem particular concerned. In a statement to the BBC, Apple actually says that it's doing "more than others" to protect consumers from in-app purchases, pointing specifically to the upcoming iOS 8 feature Ask to Buy, which prevents children from making purchases and instead allows them to send that purchase to a parent for approval.
Lots of talk and a different approach that's specific to apple, for what apple thinks is appropriate.
> The EC notes that Apple has not yet done anything to address these concerns.
> The summary is flamebait.
The summary is accurate. If it wasn't, there would be a filed issue with the EC. You WANT Apple to be in the right...which it may be. That's irrelevant.
Welding. It's great money, a specialized skill, transferable to almost any local/regional economy, stable technology, and you get a union.
> a great many people take me very seriously indeed.
I don't believe that, based on evidence
An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.
